Ebony defines an obtuse angle as an angle that is not acute. Is Ebony’s definition valid?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Murljashka [212]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

no because there are also right angles. an obtuse angle can best be defined as an angle greater than 90 degrees and less than 180 degrees

tekilochka [14]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Ebony's definition is not valid.

Step-by-step explanation:

Obtuse angle is an angle that measures more than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees.

And acute angles measure more than zero degrees and less than 90 degrees.

We know that a right triangle is neither acute nor obtuse.

As Ebony has not mentioned right angles, so her definition is not valid.

You might be interested in

What is 3/22 tines 33

pishuonlain [190]

The answer is 4 1/2 or 4.5

3 0

3 years ago

16 ÷ 22 + (6 x 2) - 8

stepladder [879]

I did the PEMDAS method (P= parentheses, E= exponents, M= multiplication, D = Division, A= addition, S = subtraction.)

First I did what’s inside the parentheses, (6x2) and got 12.

Then I divided 16 by 22 and received 0.72.

I added 0.72 with 12 and the result was 12.72.

Last step was to subtract 12.72 - 8 and that equals 4.72

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Odd multiplicities have which of the following effects on the x-axis?

Anika [276]

Answer:

The graph cuts the x-axis at odd multiplicities.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

$p(x) = {(x - a)}^{n}$