Answer:
The general is insulted. His foot touched the protruding bough that was the trigger. Even as he touched it, the general sensed his danger and leaped back with the agility of an ape.
Explanation:
hope it helps you and give me a brainliest
Answer:
Topic: There's a problem between two students who fought over -a pencil- and the monitor has to decide who to take support of because both of them are right by their sayings.
Explanation:
Example:
I once had to take a decision which I don't think is important as both the opponents were fighting over a pencil. I had to decide who to take support of as both of the people were right by their sayings. I asked my classmates about all of it and took my final decision. It turned to be fine as I took support of the right person.
hope it helps.
Anton Chekhov conceived of this play, which turned out to be his last, as a comedy,designating it “A Comedy in Four Acts” and even emphasizing to the Moscow Art Theatre that the last act should be “merry and frivolous.” He suggested that some portions were even farcical. Nevertheless, most interpretations and theatrical productions have emphasized its tragic aspects. It is understandable why the playwright’s intentions have been largely disregarded; the subject is a serious and depressing one including the family’s loss of their ancestral home and removal from it and other sad developments as well. The destruction of the orchard also represents the destruction of illusions—sad, to be sure, but perhaps hopeful.
Thus, as the inevitable change in society with the dawning of the 20th Century comes, the play represents this time period and portrays an end of an aristocratic era with both tragic and comic elements. The play is best characterized as a tragicomedy.
What is directly communicated and requires little interpretation? I'm going on a whim here.... An answer to a question
