1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
4 years ago
9

Do you think that jury duty is an important civic duty, or do you think it's a burden?

Social Studies
2 answers:
lana [24]4 years ago
7 0
Jury duty is an important civil duty because it lets citizens be involved in the judicial system. Instead of just giving your opinion after the verdict citizens get to play a role in deciding a verdict.
Sholpan [36]4 years ago
5 0
It is a matter of opinion, I suppose. 
We need jurors, of course, but with so many people who hate it, there surely wouldn't be enough if the goverment simply allowed whoever wanted to volunteer to be the jury. I suppose that makes it sound like a burden, as it's a goverment-ordered requirement, like taxes. It is a privilege, though, if you think about it. Being selected for jury-duty means that you're a reliable citizen of America and you're trusted enough to help make a very important decision. 
So, to restate my initial response, Jury duty can be seen as a duty or a burden, depending on how one views it.
You might be interested in
Which of the following definitions is the best way to describe popular culture?
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

Your answer is A. I hope I helped you.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the supreme law of the land? * the bill of rights the constitution the declaration of independence
Monica [59]
The constitution is, as the declaration of independence was a document to tell England that the america's were no longer under british rule. i hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
A principle reason for calling the constitutional convention of 1797 was to
likoan [24]

The revision or amending of existing articles of the confederation was the main reason for calling the constitutional convention of 1797. The Constitutional Convention (1797) which is also known as the Philadelphia Conference, or the Grand Conference of Philadelphia) took place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from 25 May to 14 September 14.

Though the aim of this Convention was to amend (making changes in the existing articles) the Articles of Confederation, many of its promoters (or advocates) wanted to build the new government instead of solving the issues of the existing one.

6 0
3 years ago
Applies to a given individual or group and is regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or d
den301095 [7]

Answer: Social markers of difference.

Explanation: The social markers of diffence are a field study of social cience, with the goal of explain how the inequalities and hierarchies of all people are developed by the human history. The groups of people who are discriminated or disadvantage by the course of time are the focus in this social area.

Social markers of difference, beyond a study, is a form to help discriminated or disadvantage people know your own story and, even more, recognize yourselves as a important piece of the society puzzle, and to claim your rights in the right and effective ways.

Studies such as these make it possible to see more directly how worked theories are extended to society in the form of fostering public policies.

Many of the recent reflections on the production of difference and analysis of social inequality have been putting forth the articulation between the so called "social markers of difference". In this broad field - that involves debates on differential rights, acknowledgement policies, the production of new sensibilities, and at the same time the reformulation of past forms of exclusion - the intersection between race, nation, sexuality and gender is high lightened.

4 0
3 years ago
According to Karl Marx, why should the proletariat rise up against the wealthy, elite ruling class (aka The Bourgeoisie)? *
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

The Proletariat would inevitably, according to Marx, rise up against the Bourgeoisie, just as the Bourgeoisie had risen up against the nobility. It was just historical process at work, (according to Marx). The proletariat would create a classless society that would not have "haves" and "have nots" and thus history would be complete.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did European countries need wealth to start exploring the world
    15·2 answers
  • A bar is very busy and one person did not show for their shift. a guest says he is in a hurry and you already have three tables
    13·1 answer
  • How did Muslim Turks influence Turkey’s development?
    10·2 answers
  • Sally is focused on cleaning her home, which she does for 4 hours per day. In particular, the fringe on her rugs must be straigh
    12·2 answers
  • Alex sees a girl stealing a candy bar in a convenience store. when the police question him, alex says the thief was wearing a re
    14·1 answer
  • Match following statements with correct term:
    9·1 answer
  • A client presents to the health care facility with reports of new onset of chest pain of 3 days duration. Vital signs are stable
    9·1 answer
  • Suggestion for world peace and security ?​
    12·2 answers
  • What should be ur first task when you began a new lesson
    6·1 answer
  • When steve and kathy divorced, they agreed to share the responsibility for the care and raising of their children. In the contex
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!