Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
Yams and cassava, hope it helps
<span>Your answer is B honey</span>
I believe the answer is: C. appeal to a Federal Appellate Court court if the States Supreme Court decision needs review
There is a hierarchy within the united states' courts. In that hierarchy, the supreme court is placed in the highest regard.
So, the decision that made by the supreme court is final and couldn't be brought back to the lower court.
Answer:
Its defiantly not the first one, And ive done a little bit of research and the closet answer was the SECOND answer choice. I hope its right
Explanation:
