Answer:
e. there is downward pressure on the price level, and the government may want to conduct expansionary fiscal policy.
Explanation:
At the time of boom in the economy, the unemployment rate is beneath than the rate i.e. natural also it gives rise to the growth of the economy, along with it the expenditures, consumer spending also increased that ultimately increased the disposable income.
This results in the upward movement in terms of pressure on the aggregate demand that leads to a rise in the level of price and the real GDP also rises which reduced the unemployment
But when the aggregate demand is less so there is a downward pressure on the price as the level of price declines so that the aggregate demand increased and it is requirement made by the government for an expansionary fiscal policy that give increased in government spending or taxes decreased in order to raise the aggregate demand
Answer:
Net income will be $160000
So option (c) will be the correct answer
Explanation:
We have given debt common stock = $680000
Credit liabilities = 350000
Credit paid in capital = 190000
And excess of par 30,000 credit Assuming the only changes in retained earnings
So 680000 = 350000+190000+30000+ retained earning
So retained earning = $110000
Dividend paid = $50000
So net income = dividend paid + retained earning = $110000+$50000 = $160000
So option (c) will be the correct answer
Answer and Explanation:
Given:
Total car = 200
Rate = $29
Computation:
Total increase in rate = a
So , Total decrees in car = 5a
Total income (y) = [200-5a][29+a]
y = 5,800 + 200a - 145a - 5a²
y = 5,800 + 55a - 5a²
y' = dy / da [5,800 + 55a - 5a²]
y' = -10a + 55
in which , y' = 0
0 = -10a + 55
a = 5.5
So , Maximum rate = $ [29+5.5]
Maximum rate = $34.5
maximum income = 5,800 + 55(5.5)- 5(5.5)²
maximum income = 5,800 + 302.5 - 151.25
maximum income = $5951.25
Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
