Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
We know that there is a inverse relationship between the price of a good and its quantity demanded.
Relative inelastic demand refers to the demand where percentage change in the quantity demanded is relatively smaller than the percentage change in price of the good.
Relative inelastic demand curve is a demand curve which is relatively steeper in shape but not perfectly inelastic or vertical.
Answer:
$33,850.00
Explanation:
The computation of the Adjusted gross income (AGI) is shown below:
= Wages + bank interest + lottery price - standard deduction
= $34,500 + $275 + $325 - $1,250
= $33,850
The standard deduction is a contribution to her traditional IRA. All other items which are given in the question are not relevant. Hence, we ignored it