1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shepuryov [24]
3 years ago
5

Suppose briscoe Cole is found not guilty of murder in a fair jury tria. Later evidence comes to light the Briscoe may have been

guilty. Under the _ principle of the fifth amendment Briscoe cant be tried again for that same crime
History
2 answers:
Ket [755]3 years ago
8 0

Under <u><em>The Double Jeopardy</em></u> principle of the fifth amendment Briscoe can not be tried again for that same crime.

Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
3 0

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution addresses criminal procedure, this includes the Double Jeopardy Clause, which equips the defendants with the right to be tried only once in federal court for the same crime, making the later-found evidence null.

You might be interested in
Which options accurately describe the role of Moses in the Bible?
arlik [135]
He received the Ten Commandments from god on mount sinai
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Renaissance originate in the city-states of northern Italy?
UNO [17]
Its C urban elites grown rich in trades.............
3 0
4 years ago
Which of the following kingdoms grew into the Inca Empire in the late 1300s?
ra1l [238]
The correct answer would be A :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1870s, most Plains Indians were successfully moved to reservation lands. The biggest reason for the defeat of the Plains
harina [27]
I think the correct option is B. 
6 0
3 years ago
If you were a supreme court justice which philosophy would you utilize activism or restraint
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

I would use judicial activism.

Explanation:

Judicial activism refers to a judge or court that is more willing to invalidate legal or governmental action. This concept is therefore broader than the strict right of review, whereby a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure is in accordance with a law of a higher order such as a constitution or a treaty. Therefore, as a judge, I would evaluate the constitutionality of the different laws and government actions, interpreting their legality in a broad way, and not only limiting myself to the text of the law.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you think the voting age of 18 is appropriate if you were to change it would you make it higher or lower in my
    6·2 answers
  • Even after the fifteenth amendment passed, many african americans could not vote because of the
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the us shift to an industrial economy?
    14·1 answer
  • How old was Abraham<br> Lincoln when he was killed?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the Freedmen's Bureau? a A piece of a bedroom set. b A local business that sold food and clothing to ex-slaves c The na
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these groups benefited from the elementary and secondary Education Act
    15·2 answers
  • Which principle is the united states government build apon
    14·1 answer
  • Why was Hitler jailed​
    12·1 answer
  • How do committees of the georgia state senate and house of representatives contribute to the lawmaking process? A. committees ar
    9·1 answer
  • Imagine yourself during these times. What would you do if you were a colonist? Would you remain loyal, or would you participate
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!