1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sp2606 [1]
3 years ago
9

Which statement would be true from all three of the perspectives you've studied: that of the journalist, of Evalyn McLean, AND o

f the Hoover administration? A. The Bonus Army was attacked with tear gas. B. The Bonus Army was made up largely of communists and criminals. C. President Hoover should have taken the time to meet with the leaders of the Bonus Army. D. The Bonus Army did not deserve to be forced to continue its protest under such harsh conditions.
English
1 answer:
krok68 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Option A, The Bonus Army was attacked with tear gas.

Explanation:

The US Army, commanded by MacArthur, Patton, and Eisenhower, targeted WWI soldiers on July 28, 1932, with tanks, bayonets, and tear gas. The service members of World War I belonged to a bonus army that came to Washington. To order the wartime rewards offered.

The Army was then instructed by president Herbert Hoover to the body block of marchers. General Douglas MacArthur, Press secretary of the Army, controlled the infantry and troops of six tanks With their spouses and children, the Bonus Army marchers were forced out and their tents and possessions were burned.

Although it was named ' the grave ' bonus, ' the service members were satisfied with the requirement that the bonus could be paid immediately on the soldier's death. Economic relaxation wanted the upfront payment of the bonus.

You might be interested in
If psychology were to be an exact, or to use Mill's phrase, "a perfect" science, then specific human acts could be accurately pr
AleksAgata [21]

<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>

This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.

<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>

The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.

3 0
3 years ago
Plz help asap if u help i give brainliest
nordsb [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

What is the problem?

I can't see it?

3 0
3 years ago
Chapter 9 Love Aubrey Summary
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

The next day is rainy so Aubrey and Bridget play inside all day. Aubrey is still really sad about what happened to her mom, but is also kind of mad that her mom left her. Aubrey tells Bridget about the car crash that killed her dad and little sister, Savannah.

7 0
3 years ago
20 pts I need this today pleas!!!!!!!!!!!explain in approximately 100 words how the Declaration of Independence and the Declarat
miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

The Declaration of Independence is a document that was drawn up by Thomas Jefferson stating the rights that every man should have from birth that the King of England had taken away. The Declaration of Sentiments, drawn up by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, is a similar document, but this one states that all women are born with the same rights as men and that the men have been taking those rights, the same way that King George III did to the founding fathers of the country. Another similarity is that they were both written in order to try to convince the population of an idea that was overwhelmingly unpopular.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Based on the information in the sentences, what can you reasonably infer about Kovaloff?
Sergio039 [100]
Kovaloff is a very lazy, antisocial and unbothered.
not too sure hope it helps tho x
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which sentence best explains the statement "Writing is rewriting
    7·1 answer
  • What do the tree witches predict will happen to Macbeth?
    12·1 answer
  • Write an argumentative essay for or against setting long-term goals to land a dream job.
    5·2 answers
  • Are people responsible for their own lives?
    11·1 answer
  • 1.What are the main things you need to consider, when working on your reaction paper?
    8·1 answer
  • Based on the following information, write a paragraph using prepositional phrases to create complex sentence structure. school,
    5·2 answers
  • List two unfamiliar words to define and use the word appropriately in a sentence.
    5·1 answer
  • What do you think it is about the idea of interfering fate that makes "Monkey's paw" such a timeliness and universal story?
    5·1 answer
  • Write a letter advise him how to use mobile phone in positive way
    10·1 answer
  • Explain why mr. gatz would want to bury gatsby "down east"
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!