the ratio of analysis to evidence is analysis/ratio it is always the analysis before the evidence
After reading the excerpt from "Animal Farm" in which the commandment is changed, we can say we have an example of the following type of satire:
A. Reversal, because the commandment has changed in meaning.
<h3>What is reversal?</h3>
- The type of satire known as reversal happens when the author changes a situation, inverting the way things would normally be, usually with the purpose of making it absurd.
<h3>How is this excerpt an example of reversal?</h3>
- Originally, the commandment created by the animals living in Animal Farm was that all animals are equal. That was their aim - to create a society where animals were equal, treated fairly, and able to live freely and happily.
- However, with the new commandment, the situation has changed drastically. The pigs, who are the rulers of the farm, are now behaving like humans. They see themselves as superior to the other animals, and the commandment makes that clear.
- The situation has been so completely reversed that the animals are back to square one, as if they were still subjugated to humans, rather than ruling themselves.
With the information above in mind, we can choose letter A as the best option.
Learn more about "Animal Farm" here:
brainly.com/question/13717719
m o u n t h e l c a
even though its a volcano its still in iceland, its c o l d
Answer:
B. John was accepted for the program, but Bill was not.
Answer:
- A Casual fallacy.
Explanation:
'Casual fallacy' or the 'questionable cause' is demonstrated as the informal flaw in reasoning in which a cause is identified or recognized inappropriately.
As per the given description, the members of the audience identified the statement as a demonstration of 'a casual fallacy' as it involves an incorrect identification of the cause that 'if an unrecognized person is seen running down the sidewalk in our neighborhood, he/she would be assumed as the criminal of an offence' and 'they must be handed over to the authority by calling at 911'. Since the deduction is based on an inappropriate cause, it exemplifies the <u>'casual fallacy</u>.'
