The author talked about some central ideas that were implicit in his book
Answer:
Act 2 of the Christmas Carol begins with Scrooge getting a visit from the ghost of Christmas present. This spirit is a jolly man filled with happiness and laughter. Scrooge sees Bob Cratchit's crippled son, Tiny Tim, who shows so much kindness towards everyone that it warms Scrooge's heart. Later on, in the same night, the ghost takes Scrooge to his Fred's home where he is having a Christmas party With his close family and friends. Fred and his wife talk about Fred's visit with Scrooge and Fred says "I couldn't be angry with him if I tried. Who suffers by his ill whims? Himself anyways..." This statement shows that even though Scrooge is mean person to everyone, it doesn't matter because he is family and Fred looks past his rudeness and just doesn't let anything he says bother him. Next, the ghost of Christmas future visits Scrooge. Scrooge keeps on talking to the spirit and asking him questions, but the spirit never answers him. They take a journey to the future and Scrooge sees he is standing in the street in a city in London. In front of him is three people that are carrying bags. They are talking about the death of Ebenezer Scrooge and how since Scrooge never left any of his belongings to anyone they took them all. Afterward, Scrooge is taken to a graveyard. The spirit takes him to a certain grave and points to it. Scrooge bends down and is shocked to see his own name on the grave. Scrooge then feels a bit frightened and vows to always honor Christmas and act in good ways and to treat people better and to a respectful, caring, and joyous person. They both then travel back to Scrooge's house and he thanks the spirit and lays down to sleep. The next morning Scrooge decides to be happy and full of Christmas spirit. He goes to work and tells Bob that his salary is raised and that he has the day of. He then goes to his nephew's house and is happy to see him and his wife. Scrooge lived his with kindness, generosity, and happiness.
I hope this helped you! (If you can would you brainliest me? I would really appreciate it if you did!)
Sincerely,
Rekifromsk8theinfinity
:D
The answer is D. Africans who peacefully protested against the government were arrested.
Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
Answer:
b. paraphrasing plagiarism
Explanation:
The correct answer is paraphrasing plagiarism because in the given scenario the writer has just extracted the main idea and composed it with his own words. The writer has not mentioned the corresponding author's reference in the text. The patriarchal perspective of maternal is used by writer. Word to word plagiarism is one in which author takes sequence of seven or more words from other sources.
