Answer:
Discount = $420
Explanation:
Inventory purchased = $22000
Defective inventory = $ 1000
to find out
amount of the purchase discount that would be available to the company is
solution
we know Inventory purchased = $22000
and return is $1000
so Net Purchases = $22000 - $1000
Net Purchases = $21000
so
discount claim for $21000 is 2%
Discount = 2% of $21000
Discount = $420
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Reduction of cost basis per share.
When you take a look at some of the rules that IRS has, you see that stock dividends do not get taxsd at the time of receipt. They don't get taxed because, the shareholder does not receive anything from the company, only but a hope on any increased future share price increment or appreciation.
Usually, a brand promise is some sort of statement said by an organization to its consumers, or customers, stating what the customers may expect from their product(s) and/or service(s).
Hope this helps!
Solution:
The home sells for = $120000
The commission that is paid by the seller is 3 percent
Therefore, commission = 3% of $120000 = $3600
The sales-person is on a 65 percent commission schedule with her broker which means that the saleperson gets the 65 percent amount of the commission.
Thus, the amount which is received by the salesperson from the given transaction is = 65% of $3600 = $2340
Therefore, the salesperson receives $2340 amount from the said transaction.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
