1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
7

According the article, what is the most significant problem China faces?

History
2 answers:
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the last one, China's political system will prevent further growth of its economic system.

Explanation:

Rashid [163]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

d is the right answer on edge 2020

Explanation:

just did assignment

hope this helps!!!

You might be interested in
James Watt played an important role in the Industrial Revolution by developing a process to make textiles efficiently. making st
horrorfan [7]
<span>The answer is the second option: James Watt played an important role in the Industrial Revolution by developing a process to making steams enginces a reliable power source. James Watts was a Scotish mechanical engineer and inventor famous by his improvements of steam engines. Today we know from him because the power unit - Watt, was named after him, in recognition of his tremendous contributions to the technology..In 1765 he created a new model of steam engine incorporating a separate condensign chamber for the steam. </span>
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What features of the setting of the temple of Apollo at Delphi help
masya89 [10]

Answer:

It was located on the Mountain Parnassus, which showed its greatness and it thus dominated the area that was surrounding it.

Explanation:

The Oracle at Delphi, dedicated to Apollo was the most famous one in Ancient Greece. Oracles played an important role in life of Greeks, as they believed that destiny of every men is written in advanced. Many famous heroes and mythical figures came to this place to know more about their destiny.

4 0
2 years ago
How did the camps change after WWII broke out in 1939?
Tems11 [23]

Answer: The years 1939–1942 saw a marked expansion in the concentration camp system. In 1938, SS authorities had begun to exploit the labor of concentration camp prisoners for economic profit. In September 1939, the war provided a convenient excuse to ban releases from the camps, thus providing the SS with a readily available labor force.SS authorities established new camps in the vicinity of factories (for example, the brickworks at Neuengamme, 1940) or sites for the extraction of raw materials (such as the stone quarry at Mauthausen, 1938). The goods extracted or produced by prisoner labor were sold to the German Reich through SS-owned firms such as the German Earth and Stone Works.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
change that saw people using more machine-man goods than man-made goods for the first time in history .
pochemuha
The Industrial Revolution saw a shift from man-made goods to machine-made products.

Hope that helps!

:D®
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why executive of the president is important to the president of the United States​
    15·1 answer
  • Richard Nixon's diplomatic relations with China was mainly an attempt to
    6·2 answers
  • How did the republican party dominate in the south?
    13·1 answer
  • The essence of the "shogunate system" was that a. the emperor became the central ruler and the shogun became a nominal official.
    7·1 answer
  • How did the federal government’s post–Civil War policies in the West affect Native Americans?
    12·1 answer
  • C0901
    12·1 answer
  • Which famous battle was fought in 1066?​
    9·2 answers
  • What happened in the National Assembly
    15·1 answer
  • "I don't know; maybe he is, but 'pears to me he's just letting on"
    5·1 answer
  • 30. You would like to see the government
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!