Answer: (2) Demand-side market failure
Explanation:
The demand side market failure is one of the type of market effect that basically occur due to the production of the negative response and the effect by the various types of marketing techniques like surveys and the focus groups.
The market failure demand side is one of the type of economical situation in which the customers are willing to pay for the specific products and the services in the market which is not fully capture.
According to the given question, the demand- side market failure is one of the example that best illustrating the given situation. Therefore, Option (2) is correct answer.
Answer:
b. $ 14,000
Explanation:
In the cash section of balance sheet, it includes cash on hand, cash in check accounts and normal deposit with term lower than 3 months.
Thus in this case, the cash should be reported in the statement = Cash in Bank - checking account of $13,500 + Cash on hand of $500 = $14,000
Post-dated checks received totaling $3,500 is a check on which the issuer has stated a date later than the current date, so it is not reported in current position
Certificates of deposit totaling$124,000 is reported in investment (short term or long term subject to the tenor of deposit)
Answer: Reinforcer sampling.
Explanation:
Reinforcer sampling is the method of applying a reinforcer to an individual(s) that ensures the individual(s) acts in a particular desired way. The movie theater described in the question are making use of reinforcer sampling when placing little pop corns cups at the entrance of the theater, this helps as a trigger that propels the movie watchers to want to buy pop corns.
He presence of national biases is likely to make agreement among members of the Governing Council of the ECB more difficult. By contrast, the Federal Reserve has very little regional bias. Also, a group of 12 (the number of voting FOMC members) is likely to have an easier time coming to a decision than a group of 18 (the current number of ECB Governing Council members).
Answer:
No it wasn't a violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
Explanation:
This is an actual court case which was ruled in favor of DVRC. The court used an analogy to compare DVRC with Disneyland, where the theme park owners would not allow competition within their premises. Even though DVRC sold the land parcel to Christy Sports, a restrictive covenant was imposed at the time of the sale where DVRC could decide freely which third party businesses could operate there. Since the covenant is legal, there is no reason why DVRC will not enforce it.
