1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrew [12]
3 years ago
14

What was the importance of the Edict of Milan?

History
1 answer:
Lena [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Edict of Milan was promulgated in Milan in the year 313. It established freedom of religion in the Roman Empire, ending the persecution directed by the authorities against certain religious groups, particularly Christians. The edict was signed by Constantine I the Great and Licinius, leaders of the Roman empires of the West and East, respectively.

At the time of the promulgation of the edict, five to seven million inhabitants of the fifty who made up the Roman Empire professed Christianity.

You might be interested in
Strikes in which two industries in 1946 threatened the economy of the united states?
SashulF [63]
There were many industries striking in 1946 due to decreased production following World War II. 
The electric, steel, miners, and railroads worker all went on strike in addition to the meatpacking industry. 

Wages had been frozen during the war but the war ending triggered strikes with people demanding higher wages. As price freezes were released workers saw an opportunity to also demand increased wages. 
5 0
4 years ago
Que significado tiene dentro de ese proceso el descubrimiento de America
melisa1 [442]
La expresión «descubrimiento de América» referirse a la llegada de Colón al continente americano dando lugar a un amplio y apasionado debate. El debate se generalizó en 1992, en ocasión del V centenario de la llegada de Colón a América.

No entendí tan bien tu pregunta pero espero que esto te ayude!!
3 0
3 years ago
How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ?
coldgirl [10]
<span>E. One relied on multilateralism and the other was unilateral almost to a fault.


</span>How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ?


NOT:
A. One relied on multilateralism and the other was too idealistic.
B. One required the promotion of democracy, while the other specifically prevented it.
C. One was almost exclusively focused on building free markets, while the other was all about protection.
<span>D. One incorporated multilateralism and ignored alliances; the other focused solely on building a strong defense.</span>

3 0
3 years ago
How many people were killed in the bombing of pearl harbor?
kirill [66]
1,177 crewmen were killed
5 0
4 years ago
The passage demonstrates which of these historical developments?
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following actions of territorial aggressions by Nazi Germany ultimately resulted in a declaration of war by Great B
    6·1 answer
  • Do you think all civilization must eventually decline​
    7·1 answer
  • The _______ was the most important trade route through the appalachian mountains.
    10·2 answers
  • In which ancient civilization was healthy living and exercise very important?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the "porfiriato"?
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY PLEASE!!!
    9·2 answers
  • The military alliance including the united kingdom, france, and the united states that was formed to protect european countries
    15·1 answer
  • What was the economy of the New South?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP!!! NOW PLSS 65638102018
    5·1 answer
  • How does the term popular sovereignty fit Douglas’s views?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!