As part of their settlement of Manhattan, the Dutch purportedly purchased the island from the Native Americans for trade goods worth 60 guilders. More than two centuries later, using then-current exchange rates, a U.S. historian calculated that amount as $24, and the number stuck in the public’s mind. Yet it’s not as if the Dutch handed over a “$20 bill and four ones,” explained Charles T. Gehring, director of the New Netherland Research Center at the New York State Library. “It’s a totally inaccurate figure.” He pointed out that the trade goods, such as iron kettles and axes, were invaluable to the Native Americans since they couldn’t produce those things themselves. Moreover, the Native Americans had a completely different concept of land ownership. As a result, they almost certainly believed they were renting out Manhattan for temporary use, not giving it away forever. Due in part to such cultural misunderstandings, the Dutch repeatedly found themselves at odds with various Native American tribes, most notably in the brutal Kieft’s War of the 1640s. “The Dutch were instructed by their authorities to be fair and honest with the Indians,” said Firth Haring Fabend, author of “New Netherland in a Nutshell.” “But you can’t say they were much better [than the other European nations colonizing the Americas.] They were all terrible.”
Good Luck!
Answer:
parliamentary democracy
Explanation:
parliamentary democracy is a system of government in which citizens elect representatives to a legislative parliament to make the necessary laws and decisions for the country. This parliament directly represents the people.
<span>The correct answer is B. It is an intentionally complex process. The true about the process of amending the constitution is it is an intentionally complex process.Either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures the Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed.</span>
Answer:
b. Argument; conclusion: From a historical point of view, genetics is a young science.
Explanation:
An argumentative text or essay is one that proffers some premises which are then followed by a conclusion. It follows a logical order where the premises offer reasons why the conclusion should be accepted as true.<em> Sometimes. however, the conclusion can come before the premises. </em>The writer of this text wants us to believe that genetics is a young science. This is the conclusion. He then goes on to provide historical proof or statements of facts that support this conclusion.
So the excerpt is not just a narrative of the origin and growth of the study of genetics over time and its condition today. It is an argument to support the fact that genetics is a young science.
Answer:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Explanation:
Philadelphia was the largest city with 40,000 residents.
