Based on the actions of Preteresia , we can infer that this scenario best describes <u>Global Convergence</u>.
<h3>What is Global Convergence?</h3>
- It refers to the current trend of various dimensions of the human life being integrated across nations.
- Describes the integration of dimensions such as business, culture, the economy, and political policy across nations.
Preteresia in helping Abresia build those facilities, is engaging in global convergence because the industries in both countries are being integrated to allow for more efficient smartphone manufacturing.
In conclusion, this is global convergence.
Find out more on the effects of global convergence at brainly.com/question/18077255.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The nominal GDP is equal to the real GDP in the base year, that's why GDP deflator in the base year is equal to 100.
GDP deflator is calculated as the nominal GDP divided by the real GDP multiply by 100. It is shown as:
GDP deflator = 
GDP deflator would be used as the conversion factor that transformed the real GDP into nominal GDP.
Answer:
Because :- CEOs & CFOs can have significant impacts throughout the entire business, & the type of reward plan will encourage the CFOs to work in a more rational manner.
Explanation:
CEOs & CFOs are a part of upper level of management of an organisation. Effectiveness & Efficiency of their managerial skills is very crucial to management of company. So, to encourage proper management of companies by senior managers, they can be incentivised by mix of fixed & variable salary structure. The variable component of salary as per company performance under CEO or CFO, positively motivates them to improvise their performance, which subsequently improves company performance.
Answer:
10.68%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Returns on stock : 12%, 16%, 10%, 19%, 15%, -6%
Now,
Geometric average return on the stock is calculated as:
Geometric average return = 
Thus,
For the given returns on stock
Geometric average return
=![[ (1 + 0.12)\times(1 + 0.16)\times(1 + 0.10)\times(1 + 0.19)\times(1 + 0.15)\times(1 + (- 0.06)) ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%20%281%20%2B%200.12%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.16%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.10%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.19%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%200.15%29%5Ctimes%281%20%2B%20%28-%200.06%29%29%20%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= ![[ 1.12\times1.16\times1.10\times1.19\times1.15\times0.94 ]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%201.12%5Ctimes1.16%5Ctimes1.10%5Ctimes1.19%5Ctimes1.15%5Ctimes0.94%20%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= ![[1.8384056768]^{\frac{1}{6}}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B1.8384056768%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%7D-1)
= 1.1068 - 1
= 0.1068
or
= 0.1068 × 100%
= 10.68%
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Explanation:
For question 1:
Calculating the cost per unit:

For question 2:
Calculating the ending inventory units:
Calculating the cost for the Ending inventory:

For question 3:
Calculating the absorption costing for the income statement:
Particular Amount
Sales
-COGS
Gross profit
Cost of variable marketing
marketing and administrative costs are fixed
Net income 