1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Likurg_2 [28]
3 years ago
8

He Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person can be made to witness against himself in court. This means that a person cannot be

forced to speak about or confess to a crime. Which statement best illustrates why this is important?
Police may sometimes have to trick suspects into confessing.

Police should not be allowed to torture suspects until they confess.

Police would have to catch someone in the act of committing a crime to arrest them.

Police should not be allowed to ask suspects directly whether they committed a crime.
History
2 answers:
Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer should be Police should not be allowed to torture suspects until they confess.

Every year there are hundreds of people who are coerced into admitting to a crime that they did not commit due to the fact that the police believes that they had committed the crime, even though there's not enough evidence. The fifth amendment protects the people from this.
chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

You cannot torture someone before after they confess, its illegal...  

You might be interested in
Match the technological inventions with their effects lever water mill aqueduct
Vanyuwa [196]
The first inventions that harness  natural energy resource is Water mill. Back then, people use the power of water to move the lever in order to create mechanical movement.

The invention that help transfer water from river to town is aqueduct. Or more commonly knwon as water bridgte, useful to navigate the movement of water.

Lever is the invention that makes lifting weight easier, mostly used in contruction sites.
7 0
3 years ago
Define sectionalism. What are some of the differences between the North and South that led to
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

Sectionalism increased steadily in 1800–1850 as the North industrialized, urbanized and built prosperous factories, while the deep South concentrated on plantation agriculture based on slave labor, together with subsistence farming for poor whites who owned no slaves.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the londan underground railway become a huge sucess?explain?
asambeis [7]
<u>London Underground Railway was a huge success because of the following reasons I'm telling you ---</u>
1. The <u>population</u> of London <u>increased</u> dramatically because many people migrated from villages to the city in search of work.
2. People of the city were <u>accommodated outside the city</u> in family cottages, while the <u>industrial places</u> where they worked were <u>located on the inside</u> of London.
3. Some form of transport was needed so that people could commute from home to work and back home, and the Underground Railway helped in that a lot, because it was the only mode of transport which <u>carried a large number of people in a short span of time</u>.
4. Although the railway was discouraged earlier because people complained of suffocation, it became a huge success because it was <u>the only way of connecting their homes with their workplace</u>.
Hope I helped!
If there is anything more you want to ask related to this, just comment here I will be glad to help! :)
8 0
3 years ago
Since Congress has criminalized certain drug activities, under the supremacy clause states may not also criminalize these same d
GenaCL600 [577]
This would be true, this is very true
3 0
3 years ago
What explains the Supreme Court’s gutting of Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby Co. (AL) v Holder (2013) case?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Explanation:On June 25, 2013, the Court ruled by a 5 to 4 vote that Section 4(b) was unconstitutional because the coverage formula was based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states.[

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Datos interesantes sobre españa
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Magna Carta put limits on the power of England's monarchy?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the Five Civilized Tribes managed to stay on their tribal lands even after the Indian Removal Act was signed long after
    11·2 answers
  • Where was the primary source created
    6·1 answer
  • How did racism limit the goals of the progressive era?
    7·1 answer
  • Control by one country over another country’s government, trade, and culture is called?
    8·1 answer
  • What was one result of the Napoleonic Wars?
    11·1 answer
  • I need help on knowing which percentage is correct
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best expresses the purpose of the opening words if the us constitution we the people
    9·1 answer
  • Changes made to the U.S. and Florida Constitutions after their initial authorship are referred to as which of the selections lis
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!