<span>#1) Which is the best summary of this paragraph?
Answer: Out of all the options that are available, the one that best summarizes the paragraph shown above is the following: A<span>fter Coptic became the prominent script, it was replaced by Arabic, wh</span>ich resulted in breaking society’s connection to ancient times.
I hope it helps, Regards. </span>
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The 1st 2 talk about the subway and the all of them are about ancient objects.
Option C has all of these.
