1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
12

Under the empresario system, how close to the coast could an empresario settle his colony without special permission?

History
2 answers:
Stolb23 [73]3 years ago
7 0
D it’s best answer hope it helps .
arsen [322]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

its C

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who was killed along
Basile [38]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

His wife was also killed alongside him.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Declaration of Independence is primarily
Shalnov [3]
<span>The Declaration of Independence is primarily a formal declaration of "separation" issued by the United States against Great Britain, after Britain failed to meet the demands of the colonists regarding taxation. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the incident which led to the correspondence?
wel

Answer: C. The United States discovered nuclear missiles being stationed in Cuba.

Explanation:

There is no correspondence attached but option C is most probably the answer because it is the only factual option there.

When the United States found out that nuclear missiles were being positioned in Cuba which was so close to the American mainland, it sparked the Cuban Missile Crisis which saw the two Superpowers almost go to war until an agreement was reached to withdraw missiles from Cuba and Turkey.

5 0
3 years ago
NEEDED ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
elena-s [515]

Answer:

I think the a swer is A, Government leaders have limited power

Explanation:

This is the only choice that gives the citizens a bit of "power". Democracy allows more freedom to the people and choices to the people than Autocracy. Hope this helps!

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What factor immediately caused Britain to enter into World War I?
    12·1 answer
  • Why were labor unions necessary?
    15·2 answers
  • [25 Points!! Brainlist] This is about the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak.
    7·1 answer
  • When was the treaty of Paris which officially ended the revolutionary war with the British signed ?
    11·2 answers
  • Francisco De Gama founded the city of Quebec, Canada.<br> True<br> False
    6·1 answer
  • I really, reallly, REALLY need help like....ASAP!!
    9·1 answer
  • How did nationalism play an impact in the first World War
    9·2 answers
  • Question 11 of 20
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME​
    10·1 answer
  • Please please help me<br> please help me
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!