Answer:
The main difficulties are given as below:-
Explanation:
Inadequate training:- Most of the researchers or the individuals who are involved in research do not have adequate training which is important to perform the research. Most of the researchers just perform whatever they want to do rather than understanding the different steps involved in conducting the research.
Lack of trust:- Most of the business organization do not provide the required data to the researches as they have the apprehension of misuse of the data by these researchers.
Repeated researchers:- Due to the lack of a centralized database, a lot of researchers are performed on the same topic.
Inadequate interaction:- There is not sufficient interaction between the organization and researchers and thus the need identification is always in a question.
Inadequate code of conduct:- Developing countries do not have a well-established code of conduct for performing the researchers.
In order to avoid above stated issue, first of all, it is important to provide in-depth training to all the researchers about the research methodology and the different types of researches. The organizations and the researchers must create a strong bonding and association so that they can trust each other and understand the requirement of each other.
The ethical standards used in both the marketing and researchers are almost the same as the main objective of both the activities is to gain more information about the respondent or about a certain situation. Thus the standards and morals which have to be adopted remain on average same. In both cases, the first priority is always to maintain confidentiality and not to harm the interest of others directly or indirectly.
1.Losing money in investment
2.scams
3.cash lost
4.job loss
5.theft
Haha, this will be fun
Let's see, when I was around 9 I had a painful accident, I was learning how to ride a bike and then...BOOM! I crashed into my sister, my sister was fine but my head was ble#ding, my left ankle was covered with blo#d, and the skin from my hands was peeled off and my thumb's nail was cracked, what caused this? Welling at the park I practiced boking at had a ton of Benches and unfortunately...I crashed onto one, I was rushed to the doctors and they said that everything was fine and would heal in a couple of weeks but the main problem was my ankle, somehow it got infected and I was in bed for 2 weeks! After that 2 weeks, I went back to the doctors and they said that I can walk but I can't run. after that accident, I never touched a bike ever again, as a 9-year-old, I thought I was going to die! What helped me cope? My parents bought me a bunch a toys and a dog, my sister(twin sister) also helped me recover by helping out mentally, I seriously thought that was going stir crazy since every time I ran for too long, my vision would go completely black for at least a soild 30 seconds. Ultimately, my family's love and care helped me recover.
brainliest please haha?
Answer:
Un conflicto es una situación en la que dos o más partes tienen intereses contrapuestos, los cuales no se complementan entre sí sino que son antagónicos en su realización. Por lo tanto, cada una de las partes utiliza métodos y se adhieren a valores que en la percepción de las partes son irreconciliables y por tanto chocan.
Ahora bien, el conflicto como tal puede ser el motor para una reconvención de relaciones injustas o negativas. Ello pues las partes (donde generalmente una es la injusta y la otra la que sufre la injusticia) manifiestan sus posiciones en forma de choque, buscando llegar a una solución favorable para ambas, con lo cual suelen ceder en sus pretensiones en la medida que la otra parte también lo haga. Así, muchas veces el conflicto permite destrabar una situación conflictiva, acercando las posiciones de las partes y llegando a un punto de acuerdo.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
