1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
8

How was Canada obtained by Britain?

History
2 answers:
zalisa [80]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is A) by a treaty with France after victory in the war.

Canada was obtained by Britain by a treaty with France after victory in the war.

The Treaty of Paris in 1763, officially represented the end of the armed hostilities of the "Seven Years War." This war had been fought since 1756, and the British won the war when destroying the fleet of France and took invaded its colonies in the North American territory. The treaty was signed on February 10, 1763, in Paris, France, by Great Britain, Spain, and France. That is how Britain gained the Canadian Territories of  Quebec in Canada, and the east bank of the Mississippi River and the Great Lakes Basin in the 13 colonies. From Spain, Britain received the Florida territory.

BartSMP [9]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: The answer is A

Explanation: They had obtained it by treaty with france

You might be interested in
The era of good feelings is associated with the administration of which president?
ankoles [38]

Answer:

President Monroe

Explanation:

The era of good feelings was in the early 19th century period. It was a name given to President Monroe's administration.

It was a period of great nationalism, political unity, economic growth, and territorial expansion. there was only one political party and no partisan conflicts since the federalist party was dissolved after the war of 1812.

8 0
3 years ago
A map that includes three different maps: one of all of Europe, one of Germany, and another with only Berlin. On the left, the H
sleet_krkn [62]
The first one is A and the second one is C. Please mark brainliest answer btw. :)
3 0
3 years ago
Please help timed
marshall27 [118]

When rebels staged an uprising in 2003 to protest what they perceived as the Sudanese government's disrespect for the western area and its non-Arab people, the Darfur crisis was only getting started. The correct response is option (3).

<h3>What is the Darfur conflict. </h3>

The bulk of other Arab tribes in Darfur stayed out of the fighting, with the exception of the Janjaweed, a Sudanese paramilitary group whose members are mostly recruited among Arabized indigenous Africans and a small number of Bedouin of the northern Rizeigat.

The Sudanese rebel groups the Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) started fighting against the Sudanese government in February 2003, which they accused of oppressing Darfur's non-Arab population. This conflict is known as the War in Darfur, also known as the Land Cruiser War.  In response to assaults, the government launched an ethnic cleansing effort against non-Arabs in Darfur. As a result, tens of thousands of civilians perished, and Omar al-Bashir, the president of Sudan, was charged by the International Criminal Court with genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

To know more about Darfur conflict, visit:

brainly.com/question/4581495

#SPJ1

7 0
11 months ago
Compare and contrast the author’s depictions of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin. What do these depictions reveal about these hist
Vinvika [58]

Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin

Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.

  • Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
  • Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
  • Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
  • Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant  torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
  • The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.

Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.                  

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a true statement about the Great Society?
Inessa05 [86]
The Great society was composed of different democratic programs which aims to eliminate the surgence of poverty. This program was launched by President Lyndon Johnson. although he implemented the Great Society under his rule, it was John F. Keneddy's initiatives called the "New Frontier" where the programs are rooted from
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In your own words what is religiouss moderation
    13·1 answer
  • In what way did british leaders misunderstand the revolutionary war
    8·1 answer
  • According to verse 33:35 of the Qur’an, what are the qualities of someone Who is favored by God?
    8·1 answer
  • How did Eleanor Roosevelt show her support for minorities?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was legal under slave codes?
    12·1 answer
  • Which best states how the Scopes trial ended?
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP LOL IM GONNA FAIL!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • How did the renaissance, contribute to the Protestant reformation?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the loess problematic for the yellow river?
    5·2 answers
  • I need help
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!