1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following best describes how European powers responded to the islamic expansion? A. Europeans sought to convert the

Arab people ton Christianity to counteract islamic influences. B. Europeans were desperate to get to the china before the chinese were converted to islam. C. Europeans viewed the spread of islam as a threat and actively worked to stop it. D. Europeans cut off all trade with the islamic Empire.
History
2 answers:
myrzilka [38]3 years ago
3 0
<span>Among the choices the one that best describes how European powers responded to the Islamic expansion is letter C, Europeans viewed the spread of Islam as a threat and actively worked to stop it. The Islamic development stirred an attention to progresses in science, medication, and engineering a long ways past the accomplishments in the parochial west.</span>
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
3 0

The choice that best describes how European powers responded to the Islamic expansion is:

(C) Europeans viewed the spread of Islam as a threat and actively worked to stop it.

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

The reaction of Europeans to the expansion of Islam began only very late, in 1096, more than 400 years after the creation of this empire. In the early centuries, European resistance was only defensive, trying to stop the Arab invasions in the south of the continent, mainly in Spain and in Italy.

In the East, Christians were accepted by Muslims as long as they paid the tax imposed on them by these conquerors and could continue to practice their religion. However, in 1071, Turkish Muslims invaded Jerusalem. They forbade the pilgrimage of Christians and mistreated them. To liberate these populations from the east, Pope Urban II called the Westerners to go fight. These attacks of Christians against Muslims in the East are called <u>Crusades</u>.

There were six great crusades between the eleventh and the thirteenth century:

  • First crusade: from 1096 to 1099.
  • Second crusade: from 1147 to 1149.
  • Third crusade: from 1189 to 1192.
  • Fourth Crusade: from 1202 to 1204.
  • Fifth crusade: from 1217 to 1221.
  • Sixth Crusade: from 1228 to 1229.

Other smaller expeditions took place throughout the 13th century but were not very successful. Overall, the Crusades did not allow Christians to regain control of the East except in a few small territories.

<h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. The Great Awakening: brainly.com/question/4822907
  2. The French Huguenots: brainly.com/question/216414
  3. Humanist movement: brainly.com/question/2114728

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Subject: History

Chapter: The Crusades

Keywords: the history of Islam, Muslim invasions, Muslim conquests, Christians of the orient, the conquest of Jerusalem

You might be interested in
HELP PLEASEEEEE 25 POINTS. WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Why did many colonists protest the Stamp Act?Think also of the colonial argument
Arada [10]
The colonists protested the Stamp Act because they were being taxed without representation in Parliament. They had no say in the taxes that they had to pay, which lead to much anger and conflict among the colonies. They didn’t understand why they still had to pay taxes if they were no longer living in Britain or being represented as part of Britain’s government.
8 0
4 years ago
What was the cause of the Progressive movement?
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

The main objectives of the Progressive movement were addressing problems caused by industrialization, urbanization, immigration, and political corruption.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which city in this table is NOT a part of any
Volgvan

Answer:

I think D

Explanation:

Sana makatulong

8 0
3 years ago
Which research perspective emerged in the 1970s to answer the general question of what specific mental processes are involved in
marysya [2.9K]

The social cognitive perspective is the research perspective emerged in the 1970s to answer the general question of what specific mental processes are involved in the person's construction of an understanding of the social world.

What is social cognitive perspective?

Social conduct is seen as a result of cognitive processes that go along with situational circumstances from a social cognitive approach. Therefore, violent behavior occurs in a social setting and is largely a result of the individual's interpretation and processing of social information.

How does cognitive perspective explain human behavior?

This strategy focuses on the impact of one's inner sentiments and beliefs on behavior. The cognitive method places an emphasis on the value of memory, perception, and attention, as well as language, judgment, and problem-solving. This method frequently makes a comparison between the human brain and a computer.

Learn more about  social cognitive perspective: brainly.com/question/14368393

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure?
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Explanation:

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Hope this helps ;)

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What factors led to the industrialization of other nations after Britain?
    9·1 answer
  • Hammurabi's law code influenced later law codes, including those of Greece and Rome. True or False?
    7·1 answer
  • Where did Buddhism spread in the centuries following the Buddha's death?
    7·2 answers
  • QUICKKKKK PLZZZZZ What was the purpose of Columbus’s voyage? A. to make an accurate world map B. to find sources of gold and sil
    6·1 answer
  • When did Saladin die
    10·1 answer
  • 39 points please help it’s for a grade
    11·1 answer
  • NEED THIS ASAP!! How is terrorism different from other forms of warfare? Provide examples of economic, physical, political, or p
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the development of art in the Clasical Age
    11·1 answer
  • Which phrase from the Preamble to the Constitution gives the best reason for states to work together cooperatively?
    11·1 answer
  • President Washington relied on a group of men to help him make important decisions about the United States' economy, foreign dip
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!