Answer:
Total Cost of Job X4A: $
Direct material cost ($9,000 x 500 units) 4,500,000
Direct labour cost (300 hrs x $15 x 500 units ) 2,250,000
Overhead applied (100 hrs x $22.50 x 500 units) 1,125,000
Total cost 7,875,000
Explanation:
The total cost of Job X4A is the aggregate of direct material cost, direct labour cost and overhead applied. Overhead is absorbed on the basis of machine hours. Thus, we will multiply the overhead rate by machine hours and number of units produced.
It would be, 750 + 125 + 2,000 + 875 so the company's total assets is 3,750$
Hope this helps!
Answer:
She filled for bankruptcy last year.
The correct answer would be, Ethical.
Joseph has taken a sick day, although he is not actually sick. This is an example of a decision that is legal but not Ethical.
Explanation:
Ethics are basically the moral principles that shape a person's behavior. This is something which tells us that how a person morally behaves in a situation.
In businesses, there are some code of conducts that are the rules and regulations, prescribed by the companies.
When a person violates a moral principle, it is called as the Ethical Violation. There is usually no legal action against the ethical violations, but it is not always the case. People may be charged for violating the code of conduct in organizations.
Decisions like taking a day off due to sickness when you are not actually sick is an example of decision which is legally right but ethically, it is totally wrong.
Learn more about Ethical Violations at:
brainly.com/question/13807907
#LearnWithBrainly
Options :
A) society would be better off with zero pollution.
B) society would be better off if emissions were increased.
C) command and control policies should always be used.
D) Society would be better off if emissions were reduced
Answer:
Explanation: The marginal damage resulting from an emission refers to the extra damage resulting from the extra unit of emission released. Whereby the marginal cost of abatement refers to the cost incurred in reducing one extra unit of pollution. Taking a look at the cost of marginal damage incurred, which is $100billion and the marginal cost of abatement which is $180 billion. From an economic standpoint, aive the abatement cost considerably outweighs the marginal damage, it spending $180 billion to cover for a loss of $ 100 billion seems unreasonable. Therefore the society will be better off if emissions were increased.
