Answer:
Question 1
b. $100,000
Question 2
(a) Goods held on consignment from another company.
Explanation:
Question 1
Calculation to determine what the cost of the ending inventory under LIFO is
Using this formula
Cost of the ending inventory =(Inventory, Jan. 1 Units*Cost )+[(Dec 31 Units on hand- Inventory, Jan. 1 Units)*Purchase, June 19 Cost ]
Let plug in the formula
Cost of the ending inventory =(8,000 * $11) + (1,000 *$12)
Cost of the ending inventory =$88,000+$12,000
Cost of the ending inventory =$100,000
Therefore the cost of the ending inventory under LIFO is $100,000
Question 2
GOODS HELD ON CONSIGNMENT FROM ANOTHER COMPANY should NOT be included in the PHYSICAL INVENTORY of a company but rather be included in the inventory of the sender of the goods which is the CONSIGNOR.
Answer:
Maslow’s need hierarchy
Explanation:
According to Maslow's Hierarchy of needs, there are five stages of needs which are physiological, safety, love, esteem, and self-actualization. As per this theory, newer higher ranking needs start to emerge when an individual is satisfied by the previous need structure.
When a manager questions about her satisfaction with her job's ability to provide safety, social interaction, self-respect, and opportunities for growth, he trying to figure out the stage at which the associate is currently on.
If Austin can produce potato chips at a lower opportunity cost than William, then Austin has a comparative advantage in the production of potato chips.
Comparative advantage refers to a situation in which an individual, business or country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another producers or businesses.
In production a lower opportunity cost creates a comparative advantage. So here in this situation a comparative advantage in one good implies a comparative disadvantage in another.
Hence, comparative advantage is the ability of a producer to produce a good or service for a lower opportunity cost than its competitor.
To learn more about comparative advantage here:
brainly.com/question/28238063
#SPJ4
Idk idk idk idk idk idk im sorry btw its just for the starting thing
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
