Answer:
A. Perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
When lines and/or points are in perpendicular to one another, the perpendicularity line between them measures the distance between both points and/or lines.
So to measure the distance between point c and line AB, a perpendicular line has to be drawn from c to AB or from AB to c. Either of these will arrive at the same result.
It should also be noted that the angle at the point of intersection of perpendicular lines is 90°.
Answer:
V≈ 863.27 in³
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)
2 : 4 ( divide both values by 2)
= 1 : 2
3 : 6 ( divide both values by 3 )
= 1 : 2
Thus 2 : 4 = 3 : 6
(b)
3 : 9 ( divide both values by 3 )
= 1 : 3
Thus 1 : 3 = 3 : 9
(c)
4 : 6 ( divide both values by 2 )
= 2 : 3 ≠ 3 : 2
(d)
10 : 2 ( divide both values by 2 )
= 5 : 1
Thus 5 : 1 = 10 : 2
Answer: (a)
P - Value = 0.0981 is high, this indicates stronger evidence that we should fail to reject the null hypothesis: H0: pD = pR (There is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election). P - Value = 0.0981 is the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed results of the Hypothesis Test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct.
(b)
Since P - Value = 0.0981 is greater than \alpha = 0.05, the difference is not significant. Fail to reject null hypothesis.
(c)
Since in the Hypothesis Test, we have failed to reject null hypothesis, we could have made: Type II Error: Failure to reject a false null hypothesis. One potential consequence of this error is as follows:
Suppose in reality there is significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. But the political pollster wrongly concludes that there is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. Type II Error is committed in this situation. The consequence of this Type II Error is that the political pollstar will that the political parties are loyal and will not do any follow up work whereas in reality it is not so.
Step-by-step explanation:
got this from chegg!!!
Swapping rows alters the sign of the determinant:
Multiplying a single row by a scalar scales the determinant by the same amount:
Then
