Answer:
b.It can demonstrate his motivation
Answer:
which author and name of book
Explanation:
Answer:
Sorry. no answer to your question.
A) Appears to contradict itself.
Answer:
The correct answer is C)
Explanation:
To Alice, the entire trial was a sham. There was a Jury (of which the Lizard was a member) that was incapable of reading. If this was so, how could they evaluate any evidence that spoke to her credit or demerit?
For in the same Chapter 7, a letter or a collection of verses was read which according to the Queen was a piece of evidence against Alice. The Jury, even upon the challenge to do so by Alice, could not interpret the same.
Cheers!
