1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bearhunter [10]
4 years ago
15

The Dust Bowl was a severe dust storm that ravaged the Southern Plains in the 1930s, causing many residents of this region to lo

se
their livelihoods and homes, and ultimately migrate to California. Even though the Dust Bowl survivors fled their homes out of
desperation in search of a new place to live, many Californians did not want the survivors immigrating to their state. Some of the
Californians believed they were intruders, competing for land and jobs. Write an essay that argues your viewpoint on this topic. Were
the survivors of the Dust Bowl intruders or refugees? Support your claim with reasons and evidence.
English
1 answer:
Bad White [126]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Dust Bowl was a devestating event in American History. The Dust Bowl was a period of time when dust covered multiple regions of the United states but eventually effected the entire country. The Dust Bowl survivors fled to the city of California to escape the dust in their hometowns. The survivors were viewied diffrently by the residents of California. Some viewed the survivors as refugees struglling to live while others viewed them as intruders competing for land and jobs in california. 

The Dust Bowl started in 1930 when severe drought started to hit the regions and in 1931 massive dust storms began to happen. By 1934 an estimated 35 million acres of formerly cultivated land had been rendered useless for farming, while another 125 million acres was rapidly losing its topsoil. The Dust killed many livestock and other animals that got in its way. The people living in the Dust Bowl areas were starting to escape the dust and go to California to start a new life. The citizens of California had diffrent viewpoints towards the survivors. Some viewed them as intruders competing for land and wealth in California while other viewed them as refugees escaping a natural disaster that they had no control over. The survivors just wanted to live in peace and make a living in california. The survivors were refugees because they just wanted to survive and if they had the intention to make money and be wealthy they would have done that before the Dust Bowl occured.

The Dust Bowl was a devestating event in the US history that affected all of the US. The survivors of the dust bowl were refugees with no intention of getting rich hoping to live and survive. 

Explanation: This is what I wrote if you want to use it I dont ming

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. To cast in my lot with Jekyll, was to die to those appetites
Otrada [13]

Answer: Dr. Jekyll is torn between the two sides of his identity

Explanation:

The conflict in this excerpt is that Dr. Jekyll is torn between the two sides of his identity.

In this case, if he casted his lot with Jekyll, then he was going to forget about the appetites that he had secretly indulged and on the other hand, if he casted it in with Hyde, he was going to die to a thousand interests and aspirations, and become despised and friendless.

7 0
3 years ago
To make a summary of a theme’s objective development, the reader should base the summary on
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer:

give the main pupose of the story

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 9 of 10
prisoha [69]
I’m not sure but it may be B
Hope this helps :)
4 0
3 years ago
In the context of approaches to legal interpretation, originalists believe that to determine the meaning of a particular constit
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

- The court should look to the intention of the founders.

Explanation:

Originalism is associated with the legal doctrine that believes in interpreting or determining the meaning of the words, phrases, or statements mentioned in the Constitution in context of 'the intention of the founders or authors' for ratification of such a clause or law in the Constitution. The originalist philosophy says that the constitution is required to be interpreted on the basis of initial/original understanding or intent of the founders instead of interpreting it in the present context. Therefore, the court should determine the meaning of the constitutional phrase on this philosophy and 'look to the intention of the founders'.

6 0
3 years ago
What is functional writing
Lelu [443]
Sorry I'm not really not sure but I'll try and find out
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is "with her friends" a prepositional phrase? thanks in advance!
    11·1 answer
  • Polygamous definition
    10·1 answer
  • What is the best way to punctuate the end of this quotation? “Ouch! Lou cried.
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these details supports the central idea?
    14·2 answers
  • Why does Creon feel threatened by Antigone. Does this have anything to do with her womanhood
    5·1 answer
  • Why is human sustainability important?
    8·2 answers
  • Every man and woman .... the right to good medical care(has,have)​
    15·1 answer
  • When every combination of two language features are valid, what term describes the relationship between those features
    9·1 answer
  • How many minor details appear in the paragraph?
    10·1 answer
  • • You started to do your work in class, but you weren't sure if you were doing it right. What should you do?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!