1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tema [17]
3 years ago
14

how goods are produced often affects an entire society. natural resources, we have learned, are limited. while some natural reso

urces can be replaced or renewed, others cannot." discuss the implications of these statements for people who make decisions concerning the use of mineral resources
Business
2 answers:
Nezavi [6.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Decision makers should focus on using Renewable resources rather than non renewable resources.

Explanation:

Renewable Sources are easily and quickly restored by nature. Eg Sunlight , Water . Non renewable sources take long time & difficult process to get replenished by nature. Eg Fossil Fuels like Coal, Petrol.

Societies face the problem of scarcity - i.e resources supply short of their demand & they also have alternative uses. So, any choice amidst scarcity implies opportunity cost (sacrifised) by some other member(s) of society. Eg - Non renewable resources used by a social group reduces their availability for other society groups.

Hence : Decision makers regarding mineral resources should focus on using renewable resources (which are abundant & replenish quickly) , rather than non renewable resources (scare & replenish very slowly). This will be beneficial for society as a whole.

vlada-n [284]3 years ago
6 0

While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.

Explanation:

  • Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.  
  • Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
  • Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.
You might be interested in
If you were originally a lender, remain a lender even after a decline in interest rates. Will you get better or worse after the
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

If the lender rate decline he will be worst of due to consumer buying behavior.

Explanation:

  • Lenders are creditors and not all creditors are leanders. During a decline in the interest rates goes down and borrowing gets cheaper. The leander will be worse after the interest rates decline. If the interest rate rises or changes the lender may get higher rates.
4 0
2 years ago
You are the manager of a pizzeria that produces at a marginal cost of $6 per pizza. The pizzeria is a local monopoly near campus
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

since the price elasticity of demand for students is -4, the the price charged to them should be:

price = [-4 / (-4 + 1)] x $6 = (-4 / -3) x $6 = $8

since the price elasticity of demand for faculty is -2, the the price charged to them should be:

price = [-2 / (-2 + 1)] x $6 = (-2 / -1) x $6 = $12

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose there are 6 firms in an industry with the following market shares. if the two smallest firms want to merge, how will the
Semenov [28]

The firms will not be allowed to merge if the two smallest firms want to merge. Thus, option D is correct.

<h3>What is a merger?</h3>

Anytime two businesses combine to create a new business, it is called a merger. Businesses merge in order to enhance their sales volume, diversified their product portfolio, decreased risk and rivalry, and maximize profits.

If the firm wants the people to merge the two companies then that means that there will be some issues that being there in the merger as they will imply that the corporate will have to take permission. Therefore, option D is the correct option.

Learn more about mergers, here:

brainly.com/question/1086715

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete, the complete question will be:

Firm 1: 30 Firm 2: 25 Firm 3: 25 Firm 4: 10 Firm 5:7 Firm 6:3

The firms will be challenged because the merger will raise the HHI by more than 50 points.

The firms will be allowed to merge and compete with the larger firms.

The firms will be challenged because the merger will raise the HHI by more than 100 points.

The firms will not be allowed to merge

The firms will be challenged because the merger will raise the HHI by more than 250 points.

3 0
1 year ago
Interest rates rise faster in Scotland (GBP) than they do in the United States (USD). Which nation’s currency appreciates? Which
patriot [66]

There is very simple logic between demand and supply. When demand is high, price rises and currency appreciates in its value. On the other hand, price should decline if import rate is mare compared with export rates. As prices of U.S goods increases which ultimately goes to international market where producers have to pay domestic currencies. Americans will demands comparatively less expensive goods. So it will result in supplying more dollars to foreign exchange market.

Finally, increasing demand of pounds. Finally, U.S dollars appreciates and pound depreciates. Trade value is amount by which total import value deviates from export value. Due to changes in interest rates results in trade imbalance in U.S. There is not greater effect on Scotland as it is key player in transporting of energy products to rest of U.K.

6 0
3 years ago
A homeowner from State A hired a contractor from State B to build a vacation home for her in State C. The parties signed the con
Katen [24]

Answer:

The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )

Explanation:

The Defendant ( the contractor)  can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner  if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case

Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • After a 3-year probationary period, career positions at Bayside Community College are fairly secure, even though the opportunity
    13·1 answer
  • When a team consists of members who come from different functional areas, with different areas of expertise, different informati
    6·1 answer
  • Madison Corporation purchased 45% of Jay Corporation for $120,000 on January 1. On June 20 of the same year, Jay Corporation dec
    8·1 answer
  • The RBS Company currently buys their supplies from Supplier X which presently has a supplier score of 85.0. The RBS Company is n
    11·1 answer
  • Efficiency
    15·1 answer
  • If Treasury bills are currently paying 5.2 percent and the inflation rate is 2.7 percent, what is the approximate real rate of i
    13·1 answer
  • Need help making a prediction about where technology is going in the future!
    6·1 answer
  • Stine Company uses a job order cost system. On May 1, the company has a balance in Work in Process Inventory of $3,510 and two j
    12·1 answer
  • Ia better to rent of buy a condo? use the information below to figure it out \chegg
    5·1 answer
  • Discuss at least one advantage and one disadvantage of increasing the minimum wage. consider this action’s impact on the company
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!