1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
4 years ago
8

Explain consequences of interfering with the right to vote on the rule of law.

Law
2 answers:
Neporo4naja [7]4 years ago
8 0
The answer is B. It creates a misinterpretation in understanding the con situation.
notsponge [240]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A.

It creates an unequal application of the law to all citizens.

Explanation:

study island

You might be interested in
By Day 3, post a state or local legal tenet that has come under fire for potentially violating a constitutionally protected free
Eduardwww [97]

A state law that has come under fire for violating a constitutionally protected freedom or right is the case of <em>Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017)</em>.

This case held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the supreme court’s ruling in the trans-missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power?.
Alborosie

Answer: It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BREAD BR
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

OMG BREAD CAN I HAVE SOME

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unit 2 Critical Thinking Questions Please Help!
mart [117]

Answer:

1. Which theory discussed in the lesson do you think best explains why crime happens? Why do you think that this theory is best?

I believe the psychoanalytic theory best explains why people commit crimes because it goes into peoples personalities, and our minds are where all of the answers truly are.

2. Do you think that individuals accused of crimes should be able to use an insanity defense? Why or why not?

I think that if the individual really was sick or insane at the time, then they should be able to use the defense. But not everybody should be allowed to claim insanity to get out of crime, tests need to be done.

3. Do you think that weather affects crime? Why or why not? Explain some of the ways that scholars think weather and/or the time of day may affect criminal behavior?

I believe that weather does affect crime, when its hot out people become more irritated and are most likely to commit crime compared to when its cold out. Scholars think that extreme hot and cold temperatures keep people away from each other and that this creates fewer opportunities for crimes like assault. The time of the day also affects the opportunity of a crime, as people are often in situations riper for crimes like assaults during the evening hours and on weekends.

4. Modeling theory suggests that we learn aggressive and violent behavior. Do you think that violence in the media (including movies, television, and video games) has any effect on criminal behavior? Why or why not? Do you think that anything should be done to censor violence in the media?

I do understand why violence in the media can portray individuals actions. People see these acts commited and may take into their own account to commit them. But everyone has had thoughts on their own, to fight a sibling or a friend. These can happen without even playing a movie with violence in it. I also believe that many people can recognize what appropriate ways to defend themselves without shooting someone. It is about recognizing what is appropriate and what is not.

5. Eysenck argues that certain personality types are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. Do you think that our personalities contribute to whether we commit crimes or not? Why or why not?

I think that our personalities contribute to crimes that are committed. If someone had social problems and anger issues, they would be more likely to commit a crime compared to a properly socialized person who has their anger under control.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today?
Tju [1.3M]

Answer: I would say A

Explanation:

Due to the simple fact that a hair simple contains DNA

Also, It couldn't be B because it is not a form of discipline

Where In the option of C it is not necessary for a conviction

Answer choice D; a hair sample is not going to lead to skeptical testimony because it is not testimonial evidence.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happens after both houses pass the exact same bill?
    8·2 answers
  • A person commits criminally negligent homicide if they cause the death of an individual by criminal negligence.
    8·2 answers
  • What are the problems to live in a group according to law?<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
    12·1 answer
  • ASAP!! Create a list of what you believe Human Rights Should Be
    7·2 answers
  • Why are police officers often reluctant to get mental health counseling, and how are police departments attempting to make it ea
    15·1 answer
  • ***50 POINTS+BRAINLIEST*** Number 8 <br> Question in picture below.
    15·1 answer
  • Summarize Arizona v Evans
    14·1 answer
  • What should a security officer do if an incident does occur?
    15·1 answer
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!