1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
13

29 PTS...Kant or Rawls?

Law
2 answers:
valina [46]3 years ago
7 0
Rawls
Is the only right answer
Reika [66]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

rawls

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How can I prepare for a criminal justice career as a sophomore in high school? (10th grade)
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

How you can prepare for a criminal justice career is take History classs(to learn about past events that have happened with criminals and laws) , Criminal/Law classes (if you have them in your school) or could just research everything by the internet which is not a problem.

7 0
3 years ago
Process of evidence recording? ​
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure.

<h3>What is Evidence Recording?</h3>

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure. In the midst of an intense interview or a complex observation, it exists possible to forget to create adequate notes or overlook recording important information about how the information existed acquired. Such lapses, however, can seriously harm the research because essential facts may be forgotten or overlooked. Inadequate notes can also generate situations should any resulting sanction be appealed.

Interviews – written notes or audio recorded:

  • Record the interviewee’s name, address, telephone number, and connection to the certified program/incident. If others exist present during the interview, this should also be reported along with remembering information. In the rare instances when a child exists interviewed, record the date of birth.

  • Note: because interview notes exist potentially subject to public disclosure, the certification worker must be aware of confidentiality provisions. Record the location and the beginning and stop periods of all interviews.

  • Document the questions posed to the interviewee and their response. The certification worker should endeavor to keep the interviewee on track via skillful interviewing. Sometimes, however, superfluous data will be offered. It is normally sufficient to document statements as created and make editing decisions at a later point in the investigation.

  • At the judgment of the certification worker, the interviewee may be requested to read written interview notes and sign and date them suggesting that the notes accurately describe what the interviewee said.

Observations:

The certification worker should carefully document where the observation occurs, the start/stop time, the names of persons present and their relationship to the certified program/incident, and a factual narrative or bullet presentation of what is observed. The observation may be signed by the person(s) making them who can testify to the facts.

Affidavits and written statements:

The value of the information obtained is considerably enhanced if a witness or collateral contact is willing to make a written statement of the information furnished. Generally, the statement maker should write the statement, but this is not mandatory. In some cases, the certification worker may write the statement for the person and have every page read by, or read to, and signed and dated by the statement maker. The statement maker’s name, address, telephone number and relationship to the center / incident should be included in the statement.

Photographs:

Photographs exist good, primary evidence, as they demonstrate an objective, factual and objective record. However, they can only document visual compliance or noncompliance with certification needs. They cannot reflect the lack of some activity, object, or person because whatever exists absent could be just outside the camera’s field of vision. Photographs should be labeled with the place, time and date carried and the name(s) of a person who exists able to testify to that evidence. When a photograph lives taken of a child(ren), the confidentiality of the child(ren) shall be maintained. To the extent practicable, avoid photographing faces.

Diagrams / program floor plans:

Sometimes it may be helpful to draw a diagram of the area of objects, program staff, and so forth. This may be particularly helpful when documenting visual barriers, etc. Diagrams should be as near to scale as possible - and should be labeled and dated by the drawer.

Program documents:

The most original document exists always the best evidence to contain. However, the certification worker might have to utilize a photocopy of an original document or simply record information from monitored records. Notes on photocopies or observations should contain information about what the document designates, the date and where it existed collected, and the name of the individual who is able to testify to that evidence.

Records from other Agencies:

During the course of a complaint examination, the certification worker may require to obtain a record(s) from other agencies or offices. When a document exists obtained, it stands best practice if the person providing it proves that the document(s) exists as a true and actual copy. Some agencies or offices, particularly court agencies and law enforcement, have their own certification format.

To learn more about Evidence Recording refer to:

brainly.com/question/27346773

#SPJ9

3 0
2 years ago
Trace the history of public law enforcement in the United States across any century.
Vikki [24]

Answer:

The development of policing in the United States closely followed the development of policing in England. In the early colonies policing took two forms. It was both informal and communal, which is referred to as the “Watch,” or private-for-profit policing, which is called “The Big Stick” (Spitzer, 1979).

The watch system was composed of community volunteers whose primary duty was to warn of impending danger. Boston created a night watch in 1636, New York in 1658 and Philadelphia in 1700. The night watch was not a particularly effective crime control device. Watchmen often slept or drank on duty. While the watch was theoretically voluntary, many “volunteers” were simply attempting to evade military service, were conscript forced into service by their town, or were performing watch duties as a form of punishment. Philadelphia created the first day watch in 1833 and New York instituted a day watch in 1844 as a supplement to its new municipal police force (Gaines, Kappeler, and Vaughn 1999).

Augmenting the watch system was a system of constables, official law enforcement officers, usually paid by the fee system for warrants they served. Constables had a variety of non-law enforcement functions to perform as well, including serving as land surveyors and verifying the accuracy of weights and measures. In many cities constables were given the responsibility of supervising the activities of the night watch.

These informal modalities of policing continued well after the American Revolution. It was not until the 1830s that the idea of a centralized municipal police department first emerged in the United States. In 1838, the city of Boston established the first American police force, followed by New York City in 1845, Albany, NY and Chicago in 1851, New Orleans and Cincinnati in 1853, Philadelphia in 1855, and Newark, NJ and Baltimore in 1857 (Harring 1983, Lundman 1980; Lynch 1984). By the 1880s all major U.S. cities had municipal police forces in place.

These “modern police” organizations shared similar characteristics: (1) they were publicly supported and bureaucratic in form; (2) police officers were full-time employees, not community volunteers or case-by-case fee retainers; (3) departments had permanent and fixed rules and procedures, and employment as a police officers was continuous; (4) police departments were accountable to a central governmental authority (Lundman 1980).

In the Southern states the development of American policing followed a different path. The genesis of the modern police organization in the South is the “Slave Patrol” (Platt 1982). The first formal slave patrol was created in the Carolina colonies in 1704 (Reichel 1992). Slave patrols had three primary functions: (1) to chase down, apprehend, and return to their owners, runaway slaves; (2) to provide a form of organized terror to deter slave revolts; and, (3) to maintain a form of discipline for slave-workers who were subject to summary justice, outside of the law, if they violated any plantation rules. Following the Civil War, these vigilante-style organizations evolved in modern Southern police departments primarily as a means of controlling freed slaves who were now laborers working in an agricultural caste system, and enforcing “Jim Crow” segregation laws, designed to deny freed slaves equal rights and access to the political system.

The key question, of course, is what was it about the United States in the 1830s that necessitated the development of local, centralized, bureaucratic police forces? One answer is that cities were growing. The United States was no longer a collection of small cities and rural hamlets. Urbanization was occurring at an ever-quickening pace and old informal watch and constable system was no longer adequate to control disorder. Anecdotal accounts suggest increasing crime and vice in urban centers. Mob violence, particularly violence directed at immigrants and African Americans by white youths, occurred with some frequency. Public disorder, mostly public drunkenness and sometimes prostitution, was more visible and less easily controlled in growing urban centers than it had been rural villages (Walker 1996). But evidence of an actual crime wave is lacking. So, if the modern American police force was not a direct response to crime, then what was it a response to?

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why do we need laws to be made at the federal, state, and local level?
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Because each state and city is different. Different laws need to be applied to each.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
An agency founded in 1896 for the purpose of providing the identities of known criminals to agencies throughout the United State
matrenka [14]

Answer:

National Bureau of Criminal Identification

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where is leader is called the “speaker”
    15·2 answers
  • What new information did you learn about the 2020 debate?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. You can lawfully allow an object to extend beyond the left side of your vehicle:
    14·2 answers
  • According to the constitutional court what the value of African law<br><br>​
    11·1 answer
  • Acharges
    14·1 answer
  • This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
    9·1 answer
  • One major strategy of terrorist organizations is to intimidate or coerce civilian populations. What do terrorists expect to gain
    9·1 answer
  • Question 11 of 1
    7·1 answer
  • Reserved powers are NOT found within the ______________________.
    12·1 answer
  • Part of an investigator’s job is to look for and collect physical evidence at crime scenes.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!