The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.
It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.
It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.
Answer:
When the thirteen colonies were fighting for their independence from the British Kingdom, in 1775, the Second Continental Congress was the political organization that represented the revel states. Anyway, the Second Continental Congress created the Continental Army as a way to connect and merge the armies from all the states, so they could defeat the British forces. However, the Continental Army did NOT have excellent quality and quantity of equipment, because the States did not agree on how much each one had to pay. The lack of supplies and equipment demoralized the troops and was a big problem for the U.S. Army.
Because sites of conferences held by the big three. the so called the big three is the Tehran,yalta and potsdam conferences.
