Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Here is a counter example:
● f(x) = x^2
● g(x) = 3x
● (f○g)(x) = (3x)^2 = 9x^2 (1)
● (g○f)(x) = 3(x^2) = 3x^2 (2)
We can see that (1) and (2) aren't equal to each others.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Brainly spaces it weird so I'll put it here
Answer:
statement is false
Step-by-step explanation:
given data
men age = 4 year old
relation between = watching television and blood pressure
solution
we can say that this statement is wrong
because here causality it have never implied by correlation between these two watching television time period and the blood pressure as that by watching more time television that not causes high blood pressure
so that statement is false
Answer:
−11y, −4z, w, 8x
Step-by-step explanation:
