Framers had their blind spots. I won’t mention slavery for the moment, since that’s where everyone goes and since that blot has been amended out of the Constitution (and since many of the Framers, notably Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, were anti-slavery).
One of the big blind spots, which seriously interfered with their thinking on many constitutional matters, is that they believed it would be possible to have national politics without political parties. This played a big role in the creation of the Electoral College system. The strange tale of how the electoral system came about puts some of its weird features into context. Once you get this context, it is at least understandable what the Framers thought they were doing.
Answer:
The right option is A- Jefferson was referring most directly to passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were designed to suppress criticism of the government.
Explanation:
In his First Inaugural Address, Jefferson sets his oncoming givernment principles. As the third president since the Independence, he had to deal with the remains and hatred alive after the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, where the Federalists passed 4 laws to prevent the French advance genereting dometic problems. One of these Acts prohibited opinions or public opposition to the government. Jefferson was against this censorship with a conciliatory inaugural address instead of political intolerance.
Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
Answer:
Social desirability bias.
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
a) the acquiescent response set
b) social desirability bias
c) cultural bias
d) random error
In psychology, the term social desirability bias refers to the<u> tendency people have to answers questions in a manner that will make them look better than how they actually are.</u> In other words, their answers will make them look more favorably by the surveyors.
Therefore, we can say that the tendency of people to answer questions through a filter that will convey a favorable impression is called social desirability bias.
