Answer:
After his demise, she wedded his child, Gaozong (r. 649-683 CE) and became ruler associate however really was the force behind the sovereign. At the point when Gaozong passed on in 683 CE, Wu assumed responsibility for the public authority as sovereign matron, setting two of her children on the seat and eliminating them nearly as fast.
Explanation:
U decide!
Government financial support for certain religious programs or religious practices is permitted under<span> to the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment </span>
<span>Accommodation view under this clause refers to Government's right to provide a place to stay or hold an event, including events such as religious gathering.</span>
Because people loved the flag and what it stood
Answer:
Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for direct patent infringement
Explanation:
In the court of law it is difficult to prove that Samantha did not know that the earlier patent existed. As, far as the court knows she made a comb which was identical to the one of the patent.
She would not be able to sell the rest of her inventory she would be held guilty of infringing the patent whether she had known or not known.
So, Harry's statement was wrong.