Nepal is loosing it's equality manpower .justify
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Because the whole base of a country is it's people. Without a well educated and efficient populace, a country is doomed
I believe the answer is:
《Biblical allusions》
hope this help.
Answer:
C - habituation.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, when an infant is repeatedly faced or exposed to a visual stimulus, their interest wanes and look away or refuse looking sooner. This decrease in the infant's responsiveness is called habituation. So, in other words, this is a process in which a response decreases as it's exposure is longer or becomes more repeated. There are times where the response is to completely ignore it. To add another example, it could happen that we have or work with a noisy air conditioner. At first we might hear it all the time but, after some time, we would hear it less often, and then less frequently, and then we might even ignore it's complete existance.
