Answer:A.George Washington's confrontation to avoid his army being kept intact
Explanation:
The above was no where a part of the battle of American Revolution/independence. B, C, and D ( Benedict Arnold's relations with the British after he was passed over for a promotion)of the options were very much a part of the War. Notable was the surrender of Charles Cornwallis army following the Franco-American alliance.
*Tobacco Slavery*
What was the effect of the weakening tobacco market on slavery?
The tobacco business made bondage gainful and Virginia tobacco slave proprietors rich. It was exactly the accomplishment of this product that prompted the mass importation of stolen African work, and the tremendous abundance of old England and New England. Cigarettes, stogies, snuff, biting tobacco are simply identifications of bondage's progressing inheritance. You see it's dependable with us and it never leaves.
I haven't gotten any tobacco profits from MY family's Virginia tobacco bondage. Nope, not one dime...not even a fair say in Philip Morris' or its parent organization Altria'sannual report.
Since 1990 the tobacco business has "gave" an aggregate of $59,410,256 to lawmakers of which 74% or $44,218,744 has gone into the Republican coffers. Did the relatives of the previous tobacco slaves see one penny? Gracious, Hell no!
What was the effect of the weakening tobacco market on slavery?
I didn't state reparations, since that would imply that SOMEBODY was really SORRY for quite a long time of unpaid labor....but, this nation would preferably gas African Americans Nazi-style than pay one penny for the many years of property subjection. Nooo, ain't no one sad for JACK!
The picture of Obama with a cigarette notice back to our identity, and who brought us here, and for what reason. The tobacco is lubing a great deal of political palms in Washington, DC and it has advanced countries families like the Windsors of England and the Virginia representatives to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Tobacco has long roots in this country. Be that as it may, haha hehe, isn't that what Sambo does fo Massa. Simply smile and eat the watermelon. Hahaha, giggle.
In the Old Dominion Virginia in 1620 the principal Africans were sold to the English by the Dutch. Tobacco turned into the most beneficial agrarian item in the Virginia province; without which, the state would have fizzled. Indeed they paid each other in TOBACCO rather than cash in Colonial Virginia. Slaves were regularly purchased and sold for estate work from slave obstructs, before bars and at courthouses and stores in Spotsylvania and Stafford.
Slaves planted and collected the tobacco trim, fabricated the tobacco shipping barrels (hogshead), conveyed the tobacco harvest to the reviews distribution centers and stacked and emptied the boats planning for a sail to England. Slaves did ALL the work to advance that Virginia tobacco grower (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson et al) with no compensation and not even a "Thank You for influencing me rich" to card at Christmas.
Do you know any history of the tobacco business, the first thirteen provinces, and subjection? You can take a gander at the country's organizers like the Virginia tobacco slavers George Washington and Thomas Jefferson they resemble a tree while the subjugation is the root framework that bolsters the tree and maintains its life. Bondage was the sine qua non to America's flourishing.
Answer:
Satisficing
Explanation:
It is a decision making strategy which aimed to purposed a satisfactorily result. Satisficing concentrate on realistic efforts when encountering the task. This strategy aims to focus on the optimal level of solutions. The theory of satisficing was found to be applied in field economics, artificial intelligence, and sociology. Satisficing is a strategy adopted by an organization that seeks to meet the minimal level of expectancies for credits. This contradiction put to maximize the profit by combined attempts that put the organization high demands on the performance crosswise sales, marketing, and other departments.
Answer:
The fundamental difference is in who has the legal authority to hire and fire city employees.
