Cuba's government experienced a period of economic hardship which is known as the Special Period. This is due to the reason that, before the fall of the Soviet Union, the Cuban government became so dependent on Soviet markets and military aid. Their economy was so dependent to the other which when the Soviet Union collapsed their economy as well collapsed.
I'm not really sure if this is what you want but...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, sex, or ethnic origin.
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. An Act to render unlawful racial, sex and other types of discrimination in certain circumstances and to promote equality of opportunity between all persons.
The Fifth Amendment has an explicit requirement that the Federal Government not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property," without due process of the law and an implicit guarantee that each person receive equal protection of the laws.
14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. The amendment grants citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States" which included former slaves who had just been freed after the Civil War.
The factors that led to the revolution in 1917 are all the given choices. Explanations are given in each.
<span>a Nobility owned all the land.
There was no agricultural land reform and peasants were treated badly.
b The military was a strong supporter of Czar Nicholas II.
There are instances that military abuse to people are not persecuted
c Food was in short supply.
People are hungry and there is social unrest.
d Russia was involved in World War I Thousands of people were killed on Bloody Sunday.
Russia was involved in the killings also called as Red Sunday
e Czar Nicholas II abdicated. Wages were low for the working class
Poor working conditions of the workers.
I hope this helped you.</span>
Answer:
The reds
Explanation:
The Bolsheviks were known as the reds because it symbolizes blood
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>
<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>
<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
