1. The character name is Sherman
2. He’s concerned, helpful, determined, caring, encouraging, and powerful
3. His thoughts are that he will miss Atlanta but it’s for his safety
4. He is a General for the army
5. I would encourage him to evacuate from where his troubles are at
Hope this helps
-Zayn Malik
There were discussions between George and Hazel that took place, but the one discussion that did not take place in the the sitting room is:
- To convey the idea that television is revolutionary: Harrison convinces the ballerina and musicians to rebel against the government and join him in his fight.
According to their discussions, thy discussed about how the television numbs and disrespects members of the society and that led to Hazel crying, but George does not know why she cries.
But, they did not discuss about Harrison convincing the musicians to rebel against the government.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.
Read more about <em>narration </em>here:
brainly.com/question/25609681
Answer: 1. When; were waiting
2: when; saw
hope this helps :)
Naturalist and Environmentalist, John Muir had a very romantic almost religious view of the nature. To Muir, the trees were divine and Americans had a moral and ethical duty to save them. He defined the redwoods as Christ-figures being crucified by men: <em>"Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot defend themselves or run away. And few destroyers of trees ever plant any; nor can planting avail much toward restoring our grand aboriginal giants. It took more than three thousand years to make some of the oldest of the Sequoias, trees that are still standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty forests of the Sierra. Through all the eventful centuries since Christ's time, and long before that, God has cared for these trees, saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand storms; but he cannot save them from sawmills and fools; this is left to the American people." </em> He makes a connection between the reader and trees by personifying the trees and making them able to feel both joy and pain,<em>"Waving its branches for joy". </em>He also argues: <em>“Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot run away; and if they could, they would still be destroyed.” </em>
Logical and valid! I think
