Answer: Instructions for changing the oil filter on a car.
Explanation: No need to explain. The aid is visually there because it is helping whoever needs help to understand what to do.
Answer: The speaker thinks that England has serious racial equality issues.
Explanation: Mark me as brainliest
Answer:
A - the use of several short phrases connected by commas.
Explanation:
Reading those short phrases connected by commas give the excerpt a rhytm, a speed, and keeps up a pace.
" I was paralyzed with terror, cold with fright, ready to shout out, ready to die."
Option B: there isn't very detailed or descriptive imagery.
C: None of the words slow down the sentence.
D: the technique or procedure used in option A fits.
<span>The animals agree they have enough strength to take control from Napoleon but decide they are not smart enough.
True </span>
Summary:
The lifestyle radicals of the '60s saw themselves as heirs to this American tradition of self-expression; today, it energizes the Tea Party movement, marching to defend individual liberty from the smothering grasp of European-style collectivism. And when it comes to questions about how much the respondents value the individual against the collective that is, how much they give priority to individual interest over the demand of groups, or personal conscience over the orders of authority Americans consistently answer in a way that favors the group over the individual. In fact, we are more likely to favor the group than Europeans are. Surprising as it may sound, Americans are much more likely than Europeans to say that employees should follow a boss's orders even if the boss is wrong; to say that children "must" love their parents; and to believe that parents have a duty to sacrifice themselves for their children. Though Americans do score high on a couple of aspects of individualism, especially where it concerns government intervening in the market, in general, we are likelier than Europeans to believe that individuals should go along and get along.
