Answer:
A strong central government is a form of government that is able to force the states and municipalities to abide by the central government's laws that they set out.The United States, in comparison to other countries like France, does not have a very strong central government. The question that arises is: should the United States federal government be able to override state policies? There are many who feel that the Constitution should not entrust greater powers to Washington DC and less power to the states. Entrusting more power to Washington DC would create a tyranny over the country. There is generally speaking a good balance with the way the power is set up between the federal level and the state level. State and local governments are fundamentally equipped to handle the current public policy challenges of today due to having control over the areas that they represent.
Under the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach a government official, in effect serving as prosecutor. The senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge.
Answer:
Both believed colonial powers were exploiting the citizens of their country.
Explanation:
:p
Answer:
<em>Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:</em> Members of the American Indian Movement in Oklahoma largely supported the broader national organization. In particular, Oklahoma members sought to reform the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). They believed that the BIA had been misappropriating funds that were intended solely for American Indian education. Instead, the BIA had been directing these funds toward all Oklahoma students. AIM succeeded in bringing national attention to this cause, which eventually helped to reform the agency.
Explanation:
Correct answer edge 2020
The right to be left alone is protected by the Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade.
the right to be left alone
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Griswold v Connecticut case slackened the law that prohibited birth control. Birth control was considered illegal under the law in the state of Connecticut from the 1800s. The issue didn’t make it to the court till 1965.
The court decided that the prohibition of birth control wouldn’t remain valid anymore its 1965 judgment. The verdict ensured a person’s right to privacy by finding out that the birth control prohibition law violated a person’s right to marital privacy.
In the Roe v Wade case of 1973 the court ruled that a pregnant woman had the liberty to choose to have an abortion and there wouldn’t be excessive government restriction on that liberty. The decisions of the Supreme Court safeguarded the right to privacy of the people.
