Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
His firm is using a sales orientation
Sales orientation refers to a business technique that rely on it's selling and persuasion technique as their main source of income.
Company that use sales orientation usually sold a type of product that is high in price and not commonly bought by the costumers in large quantity.
The alignment of the yes and no arrows is confusing in some portions
Answer:
a. 750
Explanation:
units completed and transferred out = beginning work in process + units started - ending work in progress = 225 units + 675 units - 150 units = 750 units
The number of units completed and transferred out refer to the total number of finished units during a certain period and their cost is referred to as cost of goods manufactured.