Answer:
C, the board of directors of IFS
Explanation:
The board of the IFS is ultimately responsible for the corporate climate that resulted in the use of substandard ingredients in the meals meant for the troops.
This is because the directors are the ones at the helm of affairs and they decide what happens in the IFS. This means that at least one of the directors is aware of the use of substandard ingredients . It can be said that if one knows, all other know. This phrase convieniently indicts the directors.
Cheers.
Answer:
This is an example of an emergent strategy
Explanation:
An emergent strategy is an unplanned strategy it is the strategy that actually happens as a result of changes in the external environment of the business and it shows the responds to such changes. Although it is unintended, adopting an emergent strategy helps a business adapt more flexibly to the practicalities of changing market conditions.
Therefore the type of strategy adopted is an emergent strategy
Answer:
The sentence is unethical if there is a clear responsability on the mistakes. If the mistakes were made, and no one can be truly held accountable for that, then, the sentence is not unethical.
Explanation:
For example, if the government is corrupt, and officials actively commit embezzlement, the phrase "mistakes were made" is unethical because it is diverting the personal responsability of the corrupt officials.
But if for example, there is a volcano eruption, and the goverment tries its best to avoid casualties, but because of some involuntary mistakes some people still die, the phrase is not unethical because the mistakes were not voluntary and the consequences of those were not intended.
Indra is using counterfactual thinking to discover alternatives for a past unexpected outcome the next step for her is to identify other factors that may serve as hindrance and need to be overcome.
<h3>What is counterfactual thinking?</h3>
Counterfactual thinking is done when an individual needs alternative methods or way to do a thing that has been done.
The initial method may not be as productive as the individual expected.
This will make an individual think of all the factors that may have hindered the desired result.
Therefore, Indra is using counterfactual thinking to discover alternatives for a past unexpected outcome the next step for her is to identify other factors that may serve as hindrance and need to be overcome.
Learn more on Counterfactual thinking below
brainly.com/question/13844623
#SPJ1
Answer: A. increases with the number of H consumers.
Explanation: If all type H customers are currently purchasing the product, it means that its customer base is large and significant enough and as such the firm would prefer to sell all of its product to H, and also do to the fact that there is only so much supply that a firm can provide. But, fewer quantities of goods would remain for L if more and more goods are sold to H. Due to this lower quantity supplied to the L customer base, it then means that the firm can set the price higher for L. This is because at a higher price, quantity demanded reduces (which is expected for L) and it can therefore maintain supply to H which has more customers.
