The answer to this question is:
<span>All of the following are intangible assets except??
</span><span>D-"Accounts Receivable."
Hoped This helped, </span><span>
Awifeamother
Your Welcome :) </span>
Answer:
The payback period in years is closest to;
B). 3.00
Explanation:
<em>Step 1: Determine the total cost of the go-kart</em>
Using the expression;
Total cost=purchase cost+annual depreciation×number of years
where;
purchase cost=$5,100
assume annual depreciation=0
number of years to payback=n
replacing;
Total cost=5,100+(0×n)=5,100
<em>Step 2: Total cash inflows</em>
Total cash inflows=(1,700×n)=1,700 n
<em>Step 3: Determine payback period</em>
Equate total cost to total cash inflows
5,100=1,700 n
n=5,100/1,700
n=3
The payback period in years is closest to 3 years
B). <span> the source and direction of energy expression for a person
I think that is the answer. Not 100% sure though</span>
Answer:
<em>Computation of the interest expense using the equation as shown below:
</em>
Interest expense for year 1 = Notes payable * Interest rate
= $100,000 * 10%
= $7,000
Notes payable reduction in Year 1 = $14,238 - $7,000
= $7,238
General journal entry
Item Debit Credit
<em>Notes payable $7,745</em>
Interest expense $6,493
Cash $14,238
Workings
Interest expense = ($100,000 - $7,238) * 7%
= $92,762 * 7%
=$6,493
Answer:
b) not likely to have jurisdiction over the case because QuickAds is based in Georgia.
Explanation:
The Alabama court only has jurisdiction in actions that were performed within the boundary of the state of Alabama. Although David is a resident of Alabama, his law suit is likely due to actions carried out in Georgia where QuickAds the internet company is based.
Also QuickAds only contact with persons in Alabama has been through QuickAds passive advertising.
In this scenario the case can be tried in federal court because it can handle cases across state borders.
