1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
topjm [15]
3 years ago
10

What was the Constitution's system of checks and balances designed to do?

History
1 answer:
fomenos3 years ago
6 0
Checks and Balances. The Constitution divided the Government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. ... Just like the phrase sounds, the point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers.
You might be interested in
What where the results of the treaty of Versailles​
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

The Versailles Treaty forced Germany to give up territory to Belgium, Czechoslovakia and Poland, return Alsace and Lorraine to France and cede all of its overseas colonies in China, Pacific and Africa to the Allied nations.

Explanation:

pretty much it just forced germant to give up territory so belgium could have it

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following BEST describes a citizen journalist?
Furkat [3]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these statements about family relationships is<br> true on Colonel Lloyd's plantation?
Savatey [412]

Answer:

he proceeded to narrate some of the facts in his own history as a slave, and in the course of his speech gave utterance to many noble thoughts and thrilling reflections. As soon as he had taken his seat, filled with hope and admiration, I rose, and declared that PATRICK HENRY, of revolutionary fame, never made a speech more eloquent in the cause of liberty, than the one we had just listened to from the lips of that hunted fugitive. So I believed at that time,--such is my belief now. I reminded the audience of the peril which surrounded this self-emancipated young man at the North, --even in Massachusetts, on the soil of the Pilgrim Fathers, among the descendants of revolutionary sires; and I appealed to them, whether they would ever allow him to be carried back into slavery,--law or no law, constitution or no constitution. The response was unanimous and in thunder-tones--"NO!" "Will you succor and protect him as a brother-man--a resident of the old Bay State?" "YES!" shouted the whole mass, with an energy so startling, that the ruthless tyrants south of Mason and Dixon's line might almost have heard the mighty burst of feeling, and recognized it as the pledge of an invincible determination, on the part of those who gave it, never to betray him that wanders, but to hide the outcast, and firmly to abide the consequences.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did europe and the united states respond to the japanese invade and massacre of manchuria in 1931?
grandymaker [24]

<em>The Japanese invasion of Manchuria began on 18 September 1931, when the Kwantung Army of the Empire of Japan invaded Manchuria immediately following the Mukden Incident. After the war, the Japanese established the puppet state of Manchukuo. Their occupation lasted until the Soviet Union and Mongolia launched the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation in 1945.</em>

<em />

<em>The South Manchuria Railway Zone and the Korean Peninsula were already under the control of the Japanese Empire since the Russo-Japanese War of 1904. Japan's ongoing industrialization and militarization ensured their growing dependence on oil and metal imports from the US.[2] The US sanctions which prevented trade with the United States (which had occupied the Philippines around the same time) resulted in Japan furthering their expansion in the territory of China and Southeast Asia.[3] The invasion is sometimes cited as an alternative starting date for World War II, in contrast with the more commonly accepted one of September 1939.[4]</em>

<em />

<em>With the invasion having attracted great international attention, the League of Nations produced the Lytton Commission (headed by British politician Victor Bulwer-Lytton) to evaluate the situation, with the organization delivering its findings in October 1932. The label of the invasion as ethically illegitimate prompted the Japanese government to withdraw from the League entirely.</em>

<em />

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain how a person's point of view might change his or her opinion or impression of a historical event
Elis [28]
If you were in Germany back when they thought it was a good idea to exterminate the Jewish people but if you lived in America or any of the ally country all believed that the Jewish population should not die in order to bring back the social economy of Germany. <span />
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase best characterizes Otto Frank?
    6·1 answer
  • How would you best describe a hypothesis
    8·2 answers
  • Drag the events in the Black Power movement into the correct order The black Panther party called for jobs, housing, and educati
    14·2 answers
  • Many writers of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were as popular, or even more popular, during their lifetimes as william
    5·1 answer
  • Answer all paragraph questions ASAP for brainliest !!!
    13·1 answer
  • What native american tribe was part of the first thanksgiving
    13·1 answer
  • Help me please I’m on a time
    6·1 answer
  • Look at the change in population in Europe from 1300 to 1400, during the Black Death epidemic. Use a calculator to determine the
    14·1 answer
  • What was the first Spanish settlement in Florida and why was it important?
    5·1 answer
  • Is it right ti boild walls to divide nations as happened in germany?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!