Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.
Answer:
No. it was not possible because the American colonies were out to claim their independence.
Explanation:
The American colonies were already too involved in getting their independece, and once they freed themsleves they were not going to be willing to go back to the old colonies way, they wnated to establish a new way of govern where the government came out of the people and wanted to shift away from the old monarchy ways of reigning. They believed in a society where everyone had the right to be free, and pursuit happines, and the English way didn´t allow this. The American colonies initiated a change of times in the whole world, there was no going back from that.
The most significant effect that the U-boat attacks had on fighting land was that they were able to destroy the enemies vital supplies.
