Im so sure but I can help you later just give me a few minutes
Answer:
the project's MIRR is 13.84 %
Explanation:
MODIFIED INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (MIRR)
-It is the rate that causes the Present Value of the Terminal Value (Future Cash flows at the end of the Project) to equal Present Value of Cash outflows.
-MIRR assumes a reinvestment rate at the end of the project
The First Step is to Calculate the Terminal Value at end of year 3.
Terminal Value (FV) = Sum of (PV x (1 + r) ^ 3 - n)
= $450 x (1.09) ^ 2 + $450 x (1.09) ^ 1 + $450 x (1.09) ^ 0
= $534.65 + $490.50 + $450.00
= $1,475.15
The Next Step is to Calculate the MIRR using a Financial Calculator :
(-$1,000) CFj
0 CFj
0 CFj
$1,475.15 CFj
Shift IRR/Yr 13.84 %
Therefore, the project's MIRR is 13.84 %.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
Answer:
<em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
<em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>o</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>p</em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>i</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em>m</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>d</em><em>u</em><em>c</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>e</em><em>l</em><em>o</em><em>w</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>G</em><em>D</em><em>P</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.