Answer and Explanation:
The red and the convertible cars would be considered similar i.e. they are perfect substitutes also the car and the convertible car would be the substitutes but it is not a perfect as the convertible car would be the subset of the car group plus the expenditure made on the convertible car would be high so here the elasticity is more
Answer:
b. 7 percent
Explanation:
Benefits here means the statutory benefits that the employees have a right to receive. These on the legal terms are the requirements, as the employer is required to contribute around 7.65% of the salary paid to the employee towards benefits of social security and Medicare.
This clearly is the standard set for the payroll. Now this also provides for the minimum contributions, thus it provides that at-least these are to be made.
Thus, each employer when making a standard salary shall contribute more than 7% towards the benefits of the employees.
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
<u>We were provided with the activity rates. To calculate the total cost, first, we need to allocate overhead to both product lines:</u>
<u></u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Product K425:
Allocated MOH= (6*80) + (4*100) + (50*1) + (90*1) + (14*1) + (9*80)
Allocated MOH= $1,754
Product M67:
Allocated MOH= (6*500) + (4*1,500) + (50*4) + (90*4) + (14*10) + (9*500)
Allocated MOH= $14,200
<u>Now, we can calculate the unitary cost:</u>
Product K425:
Unitary cost= 13 + 5.6 + (1,754/200)
Unitary cost= $27.37
Product M67:
Unitary cost= 56 + 3.5 + (14,200/2,000)
Unitary cost= $66.6
Answer: Third
Explanation:
Diminishing returns to labor refers to the phenomenon where every additional worker leads to an increase in production at a decreasing rate.
Using the scenario described, when there was only one employee the company could mow 4 lawns a day. They added a 2nd worker and that figure went to 9 lawns a day which is an increase of FIVE.
When they added a 3rd worker, the figure again went up but only to 12 which is an increase of THREE only as opposed to the last increase of FIVE.
After the third worker therefore, there was an increase but at a smaller rate.
<span>During the recent financial crisis, many financial managers and corporate officers have been criticized for (c) Large salaries. This criticism is certainly justified given that most executives received exorbitant compensation despite a plunge in the value of their companies. Thus, their salaries are not justifiable as they are not serving the needs of the shareholders whose interest they should serve. </span>