$8 and the equilibrium quantity is 300.- Cross between domestic demand and supply.
An equilibrium charge, additionally known as a market-clearing charge, is the patron cost assigned to a few services or products such that supply and call for are the same, or near the same.
In economics, financial equilibrium is a state of affairs wherein financial forces such as delivery and demand are balanced and in the absence of external impact, the values of monetary variables will not exchange.
The equilibrium price is the fee at which the amount demanded equals the quantity provided. it is determined via the intersection of the call for and supply curves. A surplus exists if the quantity of a good or carrier provided exceeds the amount demanded on the modern price; it causes downward stress on charge.
The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
Refer to Figures 9-5. Without trade, the equilibrium price of carnations would be
a. $8 and equilibrium quantity would be 300.
b. $6 and equilibrium quantity would be 200.
c. $6 and equilibrium quantity would be 400.
d. $4 and equilibrium quantity would be 500
Learn more about equilibrium quantity here: brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Rubrics increase learning as B. rubrics give students the tools to grade their own and others’ assignments.
<h3>What is rubrics?</h3>
It should be noted that rubrics simply mean a scoring tool that's used to represent performance for a piece of work.
In this case, rubrics increase learning as rubrics give students the tools to grade their own and others’ assignments.
Learn more about rubrics on:
brainly.com/question/8990766
#SPJ4
The speaker says that she heard a fly<span> buzz as she lay on her deathbed. The room was as still as the air between “the Heaves” of a storm. The eyes around her had cried themselves out, and the breaths were firming themselves for “that last Onset,” the moment when, metaphorically, “the King / Be witnessed—in the Room—.”</span>
By wading into the highly contentious issue of Native American nicknames and mascots for college sports teams on Friday, National Collegiate Athletic Association leaders achieved their stated aim of sending a clear message that they object to such imagery. But the NCAA also created a cacophony of confusion and put the association in the potentially uncomfortable position of judging when Native American references are “hostile” and “abusive” and when they’re not – questions that could take months, and possibly help from the courts, to resolve.
Four years after the NCAA began looking into the subject, its executive committee announced that beginning in February, it would limit participation in its own postseason championships for 18 colleges and universities with Native American mascots, nicknames or other imagery that the association deemed "hostile and abusive."
The NCAA said that (1) it would no longer let such institutions play host to its national tournaments; (2) colleges already scheduled to sponsor such events would have to eliminate any references to the Indian imagery from the arenas or stadiums; (3) such colleges could not bring mascots, cheerleaders or any other people or paraphernalia that feature Native American imagery to NCAA championships, beginning in 2008; and (4) athletes may not wear uniforms or other gear with "hostile and abusive" references at NCAA tournament events. (The NCAA’s actions don’t directly affect bowl games, which the association does not control, or anything that happens in the regular season.)
A simile. A simile compares two things using the words as, like, etc.
