1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guajiro [1.7K]
3 years ago
10

AS/AD model - If there is a decrease in Aggregate Income and Spending in this economy, then the equilibrium could shift from ___

_____________ and that would be a _____________..
Business
1 answer:
Mekhanik [1.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The equilibrium will shift from right to left, and that would be a recessionary gap

Explanation:

Aggregate supply is the quantity of goods and services producers make available for sale and is equal to the money income received by the owner's of the factors of production. Aggregate demand is the total demand for final goods and services in the economy at a given period of time and at a given price level. It is the sum of money consumers planned to spent on the purchase of output in an economy at a given period of time.The equilibrium level of income is the income level at which aggregate supply equals aggregate demand. The Aggregate income on the other hand, is the total amount of income received by all factors of production in an economy at a given period.

If there is a decrease in aggregate income and spending in an economy, the equilibrium level of income shift from right to left and that would be a recessionary gap. The recessionary gap occurs when when the aggregate demand consisting of consumption, investment and government expenditure is not enough to create condition of full employment. It is the difference of the amount by which aggregate expenditure falls short of the level needed to generate equilibrium national income at full employment without inflation.

You might be interested in
A company needs to have 25,000 pounds of material trucked from plant A to plant C. It also needs to truck 30,000 pounds of anoth
UNO [17]
The answer to this is b
6 0
3 years ago
On December 31, 2020, Wayne, Inc. sold $4,000,000 (face value) of bonds. The bonds are dated December 30, 2020, pay interest ann
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

Wayne, Inc.

1. The stated interest rate for this bond issue is:

= 8%.

2. The market interest rate for this bond issue is:

= 9%.

3. The selling price of the bonds as a percentage of the face value is 97.5% ($3,900,000/$4,000,000 * 100)

4. Journal Entry to record the sale of the bond issue on December 31, 2020:

December 31, 2020:

Debit Cash $3,900,000

Debit Bonds Discounts $100,000

Credit Bonds Payable $4,000,000

To record the bonds proceeds, discounts, and liability.

5. December 31, 2021:

Debit Bonds Interest Expense $351,000

Credit Bonds Amortization $31,000

Credit Cash $320,000

To record the first payment of interest and amortization.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Face value of bonds = $4,000,000

Bonds price = $3,900,000

Discount =   $100,000

December 31, 2021:

Interest expense = $351,000

Market interest rate = $351,000/$3,900,000 * 100 = 9%

Cash payment =     $320,000

Coupon interest rate = $320,000/$4,000,000 * 100 = 8%

7 0
3 years ago
fields company has two manufacturing departments, forming and painting. the company uses the weighted average method and it repo
UNO [17]

The equivalent units of production for both direct materials and conversion for the forming department is 369,000, 384,000. b. The costs per equivalent unit of production for both direct materials and conversion for the forming department is 4.898, 3.129.

<h3>Equivalent unit of material  and conversion</h3>

1. Equivalent unit of material  and conversion

Unit transferred out = 34,500+490000-30000

Unit transferred out= 394,500

Equivalent unit of material = 394,500+(30000×85%)

Equivalent unit of material= 369,000

Equivalent unit of conversion = 394,500+(30000×35%)

Equivalent unit of conversion = 384,000

2. Cost per equivalent unit

Material = (56,200+1,800,200)/379,000 = 4.898

Conversion = (22,900+1,179,000)/384,000 = 3.129

3. Total Cost assigned

Cost assignment and reconciliation

Cost of units transferred out  

Direct material= (394,500×4.898)

Direct material=1,932,261

Conversion=394,500×3.129

Conversion=1,234,391

Total Cost transferred out=1,932,261+1,234,391

Total Cost transferred out=3,166,652

Cost of ending work in process:

Direct material=(394,500-369,000)×4.898

Direct material=124,899

Conversion=(384,000-369,000)×3.129

Conversion=49,935

Total Cost of ending work in process= 124,899+49,935

Total Cost of ending work in process= 171,834

Hence:

Total Cost assigned=Total Cost transferred out+Total Cost of ending work in process

Total Cost assigned=3,166,652+171,834

Total Cost assigned=3,338,486

Therefore the equivalent units of production for both direct materials and conversion for the forming department is 369,000, 384,000. b. The costs per equivalent unit of production for both direct materials and conversion for the forming department is 4.898, 3.129.

Learn more about equivalent units for material and conversion here:brainly.com/question/24180104

brainly.com/question/23778248

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Emerald corporation's current ratio is 0.5, while ruby (emerald's competitor) company's current ratio is 1.5. Both firms want to
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

b. Only Emerald Corporation's current ratio will be increased.

Explanation:

Given that

Emerald current ratio is

= 0.5 i.e. = 0.5 ÷ 1

now in case when the current liability is doubles , so the current assets is

= 0.5 + 1 = 1.5

And, the cuurrent liabilities is

= 1 + 1

= 2

so new ratio is

= 1.5 ÷ 2

= 0.75

Now  

Ruby current ratio is

= 1.5

i.e. = 1.5 ÷ 1

Now in case when the current liability is doubled,

the current assets is

= 1.5 + 1

= 2.5

And, current liabilities is

= 1 + 1

= 2

Now new ratio is

= 2.5 ÷ 2

= 1.25

Therefore the emerald current ratio is rised from 0.5 to 0.75

And, the Ruby's ratio has decline from 1.5 to 1.25

7 0
3 years ago
Molteni Motors Inc. recently reported $3.5 million of net income. Its EBIT was $5.25 million, and its tax rate was 30%. What was
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

$250,000

Explanation:

The computation of the interest expense is shown below:

Given that

Net Income = $3,500,000

Tax rate = 30%

EBIT = $5,250,000

As we know that

EBT = EBIT - Interest Expense

So,

Interest expense = EBIT - EBT

where,

EBT = Net Income ÷ (1 -Taxes)

= $3,500,000 ÷ ( 1 - 30%)

= $5,000,000

And, the EBIT is $5,250,000

So, the interest expense is

= $5,250,000 - $5,000,000

= $250,000

We simply applied the above formula

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain 3 different types of levels of management
    14·1 answer
  • _____ is defined as the quality of a research report that is based on clear and logical thinking, precise expression, and accura
    11·1 answer
  • The impact of crowding out
    15·1 answer
  • Alexis is choosing between a job in the National Parks Service, which offers a pension plan, and a forestry contracting job with
    8·1 answer
  • In a market economy,
    6·1 answer
  • what would happen to the buying power of you investment after one year if your rate of return was 8% and the rate of inflation w
    9·1 answer
  • A company excludes from the current assets section, the amount of cash restricted for purposes other than payment of current obl
    14·1 answer
  • Consider the following information for Maynor Company, which uses a periodic inventory system: Transaction Units Unit Cost Total
    6·1 answer
  • You are taking a $5000 loan. You will pay it back in four equal amounts, paid every 6 months starting 5 years from now. The inte
    8·1 answer
  • Marbry Corporation's balance sheet and income statement appear below.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!