I believe the answer is unfair ruling. Sorry if I am wrong.
Since people were given the option to "get now and pay later" with credit cards, more purchases were made and more people from every class were able to afford the same things. Consumerism was booming and the economy had a greater circulation of money, which was different to before when only the wealthy had certain things. I hope this answer helps
Historians need to make a picture of history so people can understand what happened. They use fossils and artifacts to make a picture of what that period of time was like. They interpret objects, and read scripts from that time to trust understand what was going on. This way, people can understand and learn from the past. We do not have to make history repeat itself.
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST THANKS!!
The correct answer is: Serbs would not have tried to eliminate other groups.
In the 20th century, Yugoslavia was a country that hosted many different ethnic groups, of which the Serbs were the largest one. For this reason, and in general terms, political power was in the hands of Serbs, who used it to try to eliminate the other groups who were seen in the eyes of Serbian people as second-class citizens. This can be seen in the war of the Balkans during the 1990s in the aftermath of the fall of Communism when the Serbian nationalist Slobodan Milosevic committed the crime of genocide against Bosnian people.
If the demographic distribution among ethnic groups would have been similar, perhaps the most likely result would have been that the Serbs would not have tried to eliminate the other groups.
